
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>News &amp; Press</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/default.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[  Read about recent events, essential information and the latest community news.  ]]></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 5 Jul 2026 06:20:13 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2026 Wood Industry Association</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://woodindustry.org/news/news_rss.asp?cat=16855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (June 2026) </title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=729303</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=729303</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Wood Innovation Grants</span></b></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On June 3, the House Appropriations Committee approved the Fiscal Year 2027 Interior, Environment and Related Agencies appropriations bill. The vote was 35-27. The committee-passed measure includes $30 million for the Wood Innovation Grant (WIG) program, which funds cutting edge wood manufacturing projects around the country. WIA was part of a coalition advocating for a “plus up” to $40 million, but we are pleased with this number and the committee’s recognition that WIG is an important program necessary to spur markets for wood products and the machines that process them. The measure also includes $18 million for the Community Wood Energy program, a $3 million increase over the current funding level. Community Wood also provides money for wood manufacturing, but its emphasis is on biomass heating and power projects. This program is critical for building markets for sawmill residuals. One final notable in this bill is language reauthorizing a provision directing the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Department of Energy to recognize forest-based biomass fuels and energy as “carbon neutral” in any environmental or energy policymaking.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Farm Bill</b></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Indications are that the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee is poised to release text of a Farm Bill reauthorization measure sometime this week. If a committee draft does emerge in the coming days, we will promptly prepare a summary and make that available. Recall, that the House approved its version of a Farm Bill reauthorization measure at the end of April on a 224-200 vote. We remain hopeful that the Senate will act expeditiously and that Congress delivers a final product to the President before the August recess.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">WIA expects that the Senate’s version will resemble the House-passed product. Provisions we anticipate seeing include—</span></p> <ul style="list-style-type: square;"><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Language reauthorizing the Wood Innovation and Community Wood Grant programs for 5 years.</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Provisions amending the Rural Innovation Stronger Economy (RISE) program to includeforestry and forest products sector-specific workforce/career path grants. </span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Language providing relief to specialty crop producers, including $200 million for manufacturers of hardwood lumber and other domestic hardwood products. This provision is in response to the economic downturn in the hardwood industry which has been hampered by trade/tariff issues and competition from substitute products.</span></li></ul> <p style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="letter-spacing: 0.15pt;">Trade/Tariffs</span></b></span></p> <p style="background: white;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.15pt; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On June 1, the President signed a Proclamation adjusting certain metals tariffs to “more effectively address national security threats, spur investment in American agriculture, housing, and manufacturing, and facilitate U.S. production of related products.”&nbsp;</span></p> <ul style="list-style-type: disc;"> <li style="background: white;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.15pt; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The Proclamation adjusts tariffs on agricultural equipment, like combines and harvesters, as well as certain other equipment, from 25% to 15%.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></li> <li style="background: white;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.15pt; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The Proclamation also expands the existing category of industrial equipment subject to a 15% tariff to include mobile industrial equipment, like bulldozers and forklifts, when imported from trade deal countries that are entitled to such treatment.&nbsp;</span></li> <li style="background: white;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.15pt; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The Proclamation encourages foreign companies to use more U.S. steel and aluminum by allowing them to qualify for a 10% duty rate, if their capital equipment includes at least 85% U.S. melted and poured or smelted and cast steel or aluminum by weight.&nbsp;</span></li> <li style="background: white;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.15pt; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">These tariff changes took effect June 8 and are temporary, lasting until December 31, 2027. </span></li> </ul> <p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Workforce/CTE</b></span></p> <p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On June 9, the House Appropriations Committee approved the Fiscal Year 2027 <span style="background: white; letter-spacing: -0.05pt;">Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations bill. </span></span></p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Overall, the legislation makes steep cuts to both the&nbsp;Department of Education (ED) and the Department of Labor&nbsp;(DOL).&nbsp;The&nbsp;bill would cut&nbsp;ED&nbsp;by&nbsp;approximately&nbsp;$8 billion&nbsp;(10%) and&nbsp;DOL by&nbsp;$3.7 billion&nbsp;(27%).&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In a positive development, the legislation includes an&nbsp;$8 million increase for&nbsp;CTE programs under&nbsp;the Perkins&nbsp;Act and&nbsp;would allow Perkins&nbsp;funds&nbsp;to continue to be used for postsecondary CTE&nbsp;programs.&nbsp;The Administration had requested that Perkins funds for postsecondary CTE be discontinued. </span></p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In other line items, R<span>egistered&nbsp;Apprenticeships will receive&nbsp;$290&nbsp;million,&nbsp;an increase of&nbsp;$5 million&nbsp;and Strengthening&nbsp;Community College Training&nbsp;Grants will receive&nbsp;$75 million,&nbsp;an increase&nbsp;of&nbsp;$10 million. </span></span></p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">We expect to see the Senate Appropriations Committee release text of its version of a FY 2027 Labor-HHS bill in the coming weeks. </span></p> <p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Transportation</b></span></p> <p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Last month, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee approved H.R 8870, the<span>&nbsp; </span>BUILD America 250 Act, by a vote of 62-2. This measure would reauthorize our country’s highway, rail and transit programs for the next 5 years. The current highway bill expires September 30. </span></p> <p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The committee’s action produced some key wins for the forest products value chain. In the positive column, state specific gross vehicle weight exemptions were included in the legislation that was first introduced May 19 and which served as the underlying bill for the markup. These include Arkansas, where logging vehicles with 5 axles would be allowed to travel on that state’s portion of the interstate at 85,000 pounds for up to 20 miles. The federal weight limit on interstate highways for trucks with 5 axles is 80,000 pounds which is in conflict with many states that allow higher weight limits on their state roads. Similar language also applies to logging trucks on 5 axles in Louisiana which would be able to operate on that state’s portion of the interstate at 88,000 pounds. The Louisiana language does not include the 20-mile limitation, however. Vehicles defined in both these provisions include those carrying “raw or unfinished forest products, including logs, pulpwood, biomass or wood chips.” The bill also grandfathers gross vehicle weight limits on certain state roads in Iowa that are slated to become interstate highways. </span></p> <p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In the “manager’s amendment” that was offered and considered during committee deliberations, additional state specific gross vehicle weight provisions were added. Wisconsin was granted route-specific gross vehicle weight exemptions for logging trucks travelling on Interstate Route 39, Interstate 94 or the portion of Interstate Route 43 that connects Interstate 41 to State Highway 57. North Carolina was also afforded a weight exemption. Under that state’s provision, trucks carrying “unfinished or raw forest products, including logs, pulpwood, biomass or wood chips” would be able to operate at 90,000 pounds on North Carolina’s portion of the interstate highway system. </span></p> <p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On the broader truck weight reform landscape, an amendment offered by Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-SD) that authorizes a voluntary 10-year pilot program whereby states may allow 91,000-pound trucks equipped with a 6<sup>th</sup> axle to operate on the interstate was approved. This is a huge win for shippers who have long contended with trucks weighing out before they cube out and operating inefficiently on the highways at half or two-thirds full. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (May 2026) </title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=727545</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=727545</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Farm Bill</span></b></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On April 30, the House of Representatives passed th</span><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">e Farm, Food and National Security Act (H.R. 7567) by a vote of 224-200. The House-passed measure includes the following provisions-</span></p> <ul style="list-style-type: square;"><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%;">Jobs in the Woods Act language</span></b><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%;">. The bill modifies the Rural Innovation Stronger Economy (RISE) grant program to include the forestry and forest product sectors. RISE is a workforce development initiative that covers several industries but currently does not address our sector’s workforce needs.</span></span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%;">Wood innovation and wood energy funding. </span></b><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%;">Reauthorizes and makes improvements to the Wood Innovation and Community Wood Grant programs. WIG in particular has been effective at standing up mass timber manufacturing facilities across the country. </span></span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%;">Biomass carbon neutrality.</span></b><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%;"> Requires USDA to assign a greenhouse gas emissions value of no greater than zero in any of its policymaking. </span></span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%;">Sustainability.</span></b><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%;"> Extends the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program, which is the Forest Service’s program to monitor the health and abundance of our country’s forested acres. </span></span></li></ul> <p><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">WIA is hopeful this action will kick start momentum in the Senate, where Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee Chairman John Boozman (R-AR) has been signaling his desire to move a Farm Bill reauthorization measure out of his committee early summer.<span>&nbsp; </span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Career and Technical Education (CTE) Legislation Introduced</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><strong><span style="font-weight: normal; line-height: 115%;">On May 7, Representative Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-PA) and Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR) Introduced legislation to create skill savings accounts. These two Members of Congress </span></strong><span style="line-height: 115%;">co-chair of the Congressional CTE Caucus. The bill, titled the <em>Skill Savings Account Act (H.R. 8714), </em>creates specialized savings accounts for workers of all ages to use for education expenses including workforce development and non-traditional learning opportunities.&nbsp;A press release announcing the legislation’s introduction may be found <a href="https://thompson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/thompson-bonamici-introduce-bill-create-skill-savings-accounts" target="_blank">here</a>.&nbsp;</span></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Specifically, this legislation would:&nbsp;</span></p> <ul style="list-style-type: square;"><li><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Create tax-free skill savings accounts to help underwrite qualified education expenses of workers. This would be a portable account that follows a worker throughout their career. </span></li><li><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Workers would be able to contribute to their own skill savings accounts and/or receive contributions from employers, family and friends, government agencies, tax authorities and community investment organizations.</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Funds can be used for apprenticeships, credentials, bootcamps, certificate programs and community college or university courses.</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The total amount contributed by the employer would not be able to exceed $5,250 and the total amount contributed by an employee could not exceed $10,000 in any calendar year.</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">A skill savings account balance is capped at $50,000.</span></li></ul> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The bill was referred to the House Ways &amp; Means Committee. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Workforce</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">On May 18, the Department of Education (ED) released&nbsp;its&nbsp;</span><a href="https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-10013.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="line-height: 115%;">final rule</span></a><span style="line-height: 115%;">&nbsp;for the implementation of Workforce Pell. Beginning July 1, eligible students will be able to use Pell Grants for&nbsp;approved&nbsp;high-quality, short-term workforce training programs.&nbsp;</span></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The final rule establishes the regulatory framework for the Workforce Pell Grant program.&nbsp;As authorized in H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, eligible workforce programs must be between 150 and 599 clock hours and span at least eight but&nbsp;less&nbsp;than&nbsp;15 weeks. Programs must lead to a recognized postsecondary credential&nbsp;that is stackable to&nbsp;a&nbsp;higher-level, for-credit program&nbsp;and prepares&nbsp;students for employment in high-skill, high-wage&nbsp;or in-demand occupations.&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">To qualify for Workforce Pell eligibility, a program must&nbsp;have been in&nbsp;existence for&nbsp;at least one year and&nbsp;be&nbsp;offered by an accredited institution that has not faced a suspension, emergency&nbsp;action&nbsp;or program termination within the previous five years.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%;">Trade </span></b></span></p> <p><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On May 12, Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), introduced the <i>Trade Responsibly for Environmental Emissions (TREE) Act. </i>The bill emulates a regulatory regime in the European Union known as EUDR (European Union Deforestation Regulation) by prohibiting importation into the U.S of commodities and products derived from lands affected by deforestation or forest degradation.&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Specifically, the bill prohibits import and sale in interstate commerce of “deforestation goods,” which includes cattle, cocoa, palm oil, rubber, soy, wood and derived products, from lands affected by deforestation or forest degradation since 2020. Importers would be required to file a due diligence statement with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) as part of the compliance process. Like the EUDR, a risk categorization list would be developed by the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) designating countries’ risk levels. Countries with the highest risk, Level 1, would be subject to CBP inspection of at least 9% of imports; Level 2 countries would be subject to CBP inspection of at least 3% of imports; and Level 3 countries would be subject to CBP inspection of at least 1% of imports. Risk categorizations would be based on the rate of deforestation and forest degradation, the rate of the expanding agricultural lands and production trends for covered items.</span></p> <p><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">This legislation is effectively dead in the current Congress, but WIA will continue to monitor.<span>&nbsp; </span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Calibri;">&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 17:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (April 2026)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=725711</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=725711</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Workforce Development</span></b></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Today, the House Education and Workforce Committee will mark up <b>H.R. 8210</b><i>, the Stronger Workforce for America Act</i>. The bill, which would reauthorize the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), was introduced April 6 by Committee Chairman Tim Walberg (R-MI) and is similar to WIOA reauthorization legislation that nearly passed last Congress. Recall that WIOA is the central federal statute the underpins most of the workforce development programs and infrastructure in the U.S. </span></p>
<p style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Regarding Career and Technical Education (CTE), the measure modifies the membership of local workforce boards by adding an optional position for educators. It also modifies the functions of these boards to emphasize alignment of career pathways with local CTE programs. </span></p>
<p style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The bill expands allowable statewide activities to include efforts to raise public awareness for CTE programs. This provision also encourages the development of stronger partnerships among educational institutions, with the goal of enhancing workforce-aligned programs and ensuring students are better connected to high-demand career opportunities.</span></p>
<p style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The measure stands up a new Youth Apprenticeship Readiness Grant Program designed to increase participation in both pre-apprenticeship and registered apprenticeship programs. An eligible education and training provider, workforce development system entity, qualified intermediary or state agency in the state where the partnership is located would serve as the lead organization for the youth apprenticeship partnership.</span></p>
<p style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">One goal of previous WIOA reform efforts has been on requirements for eligible providers of training services and operators of one-stop employment resource centers. Providers of registered apprenticeships and providers of Workforce Pell programs would automatically be included on the list of eligible training providers. In addition, area career and technical education schools, institutions of higher education, joint-labor management organizations and public libraries could serve as one-stop operators. The bill does allow for virtual one-stop centers; however, local areas opting for a virtual one-stop would be required to have at least two physical affiliated locations.</span></p>
<p style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The bill also authorizes $65 million in appropriations for the renamed Strengthening Community Colleges Workforce Development Grant Program. Community colleges applying for Strengthening Community Colleges grants would need to establish an industry partnership with one or more employers in in-demand industries to carry out grant activities. Priority would go to applicants with plans to serve individuals facing barriers to employment or incumbent workers in need of foundational skills, as well as projects that would use competency-based assessments to award credit for prior learning.</span></p>
<p style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">This version does include some new additions. Specifically, the bill also would create a pilot program to allow states and local workforce boards to pursue reforms to their workforce development systems via Make America Skilled Again Grants. According to the bill, a state, local area, or consortium of multiple local areas with an approved pilot project will receive its adult, dislocated worker, and youth funds as a consolidated grant for five years with increased flexibility through waivers of statutory and regulatory requirements. The Labor secretary could approve up to 10 statewide pilot projects and eight local area or consortium pilot projects and add two more states later.</span></p>
<p style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">For adult learners, the bill proposes a significant structural shift by transferring responsibility for Title II Adult Education programs from the Department of Education to the Department of Labor. There are also several provisions in the adult education section of the bill promoting Integrated Education and Training.</span></p>
<p style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">WIA will continue to be engaged in this legislation and keep you apprised of its progress. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Farm Bill</b></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Next week, the full House is scheduled to consider the House Agriculture Committee-passed Farm Bill reauthorization legislation known as the Farm, Food and National Security Act of 2026. As we have mentioned, there are a number of positive policy provisions for WIA as well as the forestry and forest products value chain in the measure, including:</span></p>
<ul style="list-style-type: square;">
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Jobs in the Woods Act language—these provisions would authorize job training and workforce development programs specially tailored to the wood products and forestry sectors.</span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="list-style-type: square;">
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Language renewing and revising both the Community Wood and Wood Innovation Grant Programs. These two initiatives have pumped meaningful dollars into projects across the country to modernize sawmills and increase deployment of cross laminated timber/mass timber manufacturing operations.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">We expect the measure will pass and attention will turn to moving a Farm Bill reauthorization measure through the Senate.</span></p>
<p style="line-height: 125%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 125%;">Tariff Refunds</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p style="line-height: 125%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 125%;">Last month Customs and Border Protection (CBP) signaled that it was readying an electronic system to process refunds of duties collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). They made good on their commitment on April 13 by issuing instructions for importers to submit IEEPA tariff refund requests using the new Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tool within the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) portal. The instructions may be found <a href="https://content.govdelivery.com/bulletins/gd/USDHSCBP-412cc7f?wgt_ref=USDHSCBP_WIDGET_2&amp;utm_source=953061&amp;utm_medium=email" target="_blank">here</a>.</span></span>
</p>
<p style="line-height: 125%;"><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Importers of Record (IORs) and brokers may submit eligible declarations <b><i>beginning April 20</i></b>. CAPE declarations will be validated, and refunds and interest payments will be consolidated and paid out in one lump sum. </span></p>
<p style="line-height: 125%;"><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Features of the new system include—</span></p>
<ol start="1">
    <li style="line-height: 125%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 125%;">Mass Processing:</span></b><span style="line-height: 125%;"> CBP has designed the CAPE system to consolidate refunds of IEEPA tariffs rather than processing refunds on an entry-by-entry basis. </span></span>
    </li>
</ol>
<ul style="list-style-type: square;">
    <li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">For accepted entries on the CAPE declaration, all applicable IEEPA HTSUS Chapter 99 numbers will be removed. </span></li>
    <li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Duties owed will be recalculated as if the IEEPA duties were never owed. The projected refund will be the difference between the duties, taxes, and fees paid on the entry summary and the recalculated total. </span></li>
    <li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Once the mass processing is complete, unliquidated entries will be set to liquidate 45 days from the CAPE declaration acceptance date except for entries in suspended, extended or under review liquidation status. </span></li>
    <li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Liquidated entry summaries will reliquidate the next business day.</span></li>
</ul>
<p style="line-height: 125%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 125%;">Scope of Phase One:</span></b><span style="line-height: 125%;"> In the first phase, CAPE will process most entries that are either <b>unliquidated or up to 80 days past their liquidation date</b>. Following review, the entries will be liquidated or reliquidated and refunds issued.</span></span>
</p>
<ol start="2">
    <li style="line-height: 125%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 125%;">60-90 Day Refunds:</span></b><span style="line-height: 125%;"> According to CBP, importers should expect that valid Phase One IEEPA refunds will be issued within 60 to 90 days following acceptance of a CAPE declaration unless a compliance concern activates further CBP review.</span></span>
    </li>
</ol>
<ul style="list-style-type: square;">
    <li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Individual entry refunds will be consolidated and dispersed in one lump sum.</span></li>
    <li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Any unpaid debts to CBP will be deducted from the refund.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Unliquidated Entries:</span></b><span style="line-height: 115%;"> CBP is expected to update CAPE to accept entries not eligible for refunds during Phase One, including liquidated entries. CBP has not provided a timeframe for expanded deployment. FRA will continue to monitor developments and keep members informed.</span></span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">To keep up to date on the latest, CBP will maintain all information on IEEPA Refunds and CAPE on a new </span><span style="line-height: 115%;"><a href="https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/trade-remedies/ieepa-duty-refunds" target="_blank">IEEPA Duty Refunds</a></span>
    <span style="line-height: 115%;"> page on CBP.gov.</span>
    </span>
    </span>
    </span>
</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (March 2026)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=722371</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=722371</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="line-height: 115%;"><b><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Trade/Tariffs</span></b></p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">There has been considerable activity in the trade and tariff space over the last month. As we signaled in February, a Supreme Court decision was imminent on the legality of the Trump Administration using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs on our trading partners. The decision in the case of <i>Learning Resources v. Trump</i> was made on February 20 whereby the Court ruled that IEEPA does not give the President the authority to impose tariffs under that statute. The Trump Administration responded quickly by issuing a new Executive Order imposing a 10 percent “Worldwide Tariff” on most goods entering the United States<b>.</b> A fact sheet on the announcement may be found <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2026/02/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-imposes-a-temporary-import-duty-to-address-fundamental-international-payment-problems/" target="_blank">here</a>.</span></p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The tariff will remain in effect for up to 150 days unless Congress votes to extend it, which is unlikely. The morning after the announcement, however, President Trump posted on social media that he intends to raise the rate to 15 percent, but a follow-up EO has not yet been issued. As we mentioned in previous updates, the President has numerous tools at his disposal to pursue his tariff agenda. The statute he is using to impose the new 10-15 percent tariffs is Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974<b>.</b> This law caps the tariff rate at 15 percent on imports and, again, limits duration of the tariff to 150 days without Congressional action. In order for tariffs to be legal under 122, there must be a “large and serious” balance of payment deficit; an “imminent and significant” dollar depreciation; or coordination with other countries to correct an “international balance-of-payments disequilibrium.”</span></p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In addition to Section 122, there is also tariff authority under Section 301 of the same law. To that end last week, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) announced an investigation into structural excess capacity and production in manufacturing sectors targeting China, the European Union, Singapore, Switzerland, Norway, Indonesia, Malaysia, Cambodia, Thailand, Korea, Vietnam, Taiwan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Japan, and India. USTR will open a docket for comments on March 17 through April 15 and hold a hearing on May 5. <span style="background: white;">The 301 investigations will likely lead to the imposition of new tariffs on our trading partners in the neighborhood of the tariff regime that existed under IEEPA.</span></span>
</p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="background: white; font-family: Arial;">In a separate development, USTR launched an investigation into forced labor practices in 60 countries. The press release announcing the investigation may be found <a href="https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2026/march/ustr-initiates-60-section-301-investigations-relating-failures-take-action-forced-labor?utm_source=913756&amp;u" target="_blank">here</a>.</span></span>
</p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="background: white; font-family: Arial;">According to the release, the investigation will </span>determine whether policies and practices in these countries “failed to impose
    and effectively enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor,” citing that “American workers and firms have been forced to compete against foreign producers who may have an artificial cost advantage gained from the scourge
    of forced labor.”<br /> </span>
</p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The list includes Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, the EU, India, Japan, Mexico, Norway, Singapore, South Korea, Switzerland, Taiwan, the UK and Vietnam. USTR has requested consultations with the governments of these economies in connection with these investigations. Public comments and requests to appear at an April 28 hearing are due by April 15, 2026<b>.</b><span style="background: white;"><br /> </span></span>
</p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="background: white;">Regarding IEEPA Tariff Refunds….</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">According to sources, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is making good progress in developing </span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">an automated system to administer IEEPA refunds. </span>
    <span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The capability CBP is developing is named “CAPE” with four integrated components: </span>
</p>
<ul style="list-style-type: square;">
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Claim Portal</b> – the portal will be available only to importers and customs brokers with ACE Secure Data portal accounts. Once a refund claim is submitted through CAPE, ACE will validate that the request contains all required information and will conduct an entry-specific validation. As of March 11, the development of CAPE was 70% complete.</span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Mass Processing</b> – this component will calculate duties otherwise applicable to the entry as if the IEEPA duties had never been declared, while also confirming that the correct duties owed are listed on each entry. As of March 11, the development of the Mass Processing component was 40% complete.</span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Review and Liquidation/Reliquidation</b> – this component will automatically set entries to liquidate/reliquidate on a specified number of days after the refund claim has been accepted. It will update the entry summaries to reflect the new total duties paid and will automatically collect interest. As of March 11, the development of this component was 80% complete.</span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Refunds</b> – refunds will be consolidated by date and importer of record (or a party designated to receive refunds) and CBP will send refunds electronically to the designated bank account. As of March 11, this component was 60% complete.</span></li>
</ul>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Important note</b> – Regarding disbursement of refunds, CBP notes that most importers have not taken the necessary steps to receive refunds electronically. You can access CBP’s <a href="https://www.cbp.gov/document/guidance/cbp-modernizes-electronic-refund-enrollment-process?utm_source=911821&amp;utm_medium=email" target="_blank">enrollment process here</a> to ensure that your refunds are delivered promptly and seamlessly. </span></p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">We do not currently know when the system will be fully developed for deployment but will monitor and report as CBP provides updates. CBP expects to offer detailed guidance to users when the system is implemented.</span></p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Workforce</b></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On March 9, the Department of Labor issued <a href="https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/eta/eta20260309" target="_blank">guidance</a> aimed at accelerating development of Registered Apprenticeship programs and help scale these programs to meet demand. <span style="background: white; line-height: 115%;">&nbsp;In the announcement, Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer had this to say: </span></span>
</p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><i><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%;">“As we work toward President Trump's goal of 1 million active apprentices, the Department of Labor's commitment to faster decisions, clearer standards, and greater flexibility will enable employers across all industries to launch high-quality Registered Apprenticeship programs and help more Americans access high-paying careers.”&nbsp;</span></i>
    </span>
</p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Farm Bill</b></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Earlier this month, the House Agriculture Committee completed its markup of the <span>Farm, Food and National Security Act of 2026. The Committee vote was 34-17, with 7 Democrats joining all Republicans on the committee to pass the legislation. </span></span>
</p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The Farm Bill is home to several programs that are critically important to the entire forest products value chain. This Farm Bill reauthorization cycle has been extraordinary in that the two main drivers of a Farm Bill rewrite—Title 1 which addresses row crop and dairy subsidies and Title 4 which houses the nutrition programs—were cleaved off and passed as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that was signed by the President July 4 last year. This development left a number of forestry and forest products sector-supported programs authorized by the Farm Bill<span>&nbsp; </span>in
    limbo. Among those programs left out of H.R. 1-the One Big Beautiful Bill Act—are the Wood Innovation Grant and Community Wood Grant programs, as well as all of the forest biomass energy incentive programs in the Farm Bill’s Energy Title. </span>
</p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The House Agriculture Committee-approved bill would do the following—</span></p>
<ul style="list-style-type: square;">
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Renews and updates both the Wood Innovation and Community Wood Grant programs. Both of these initiatives have pumped meaningful dollars into the rural economy to stand up innovative wood manufacturing facilities, upgrades at existing sawmills and deployment of biomass combined heat and power projects, among other things. </span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Alters the Rural Innovation Stronger Economy (RISE)—a workforce development grant program—to include the forestry and forest products manufacturing sectors. This approach effectively bolts the Jobs in the Woods Act language onto an existing, nearly identical worker pathway program.</span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Codifies the concept of biomass carbon neutrality and binds the U.S. Department of Agriculture to assign a greenhouse gas emissions factor of no more than zero to emissions from forest-based biomass energy. While the language does not cover the most critical agency—EPA—efforts are ongoing to expand this language to cover all of the federal government footprint as the bill proceeds.</span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Reauthorizes and improves the Forest Inventory and Analysis program. FIA monitors the health of our country’s forest resource and its credible data is the centerpiece of the wood industry’s sustainability claims. </span></li>
</ul>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">While the legislation received bipartisan support in committee, its future is uncertain as it moves forward in the legislative process. Ranking Member Angie Craig (D-MN) was critical of the measure leading up to and throughout the committee markup. Democrat Members of Congress have opposed cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) that were made as part of H.R. 1 last year. </span></p>
<p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span style="color: #000000;">In the Senate, Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee Chairman John Boozman (R-AR) has signaled that he intends to markup a Farm Bill reauthorization measure in the coming months. However, legislating in the 119<sup>th</sup> Congress will slow to a halt the closer we get to the November mid-term elections. Nevertheless, WIA will continue to work the process to secure our priorities in whatever Farm Bill product emerges later this year.</span></span>
    </span>
</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (February 2026)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=720378</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=720378</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Trade </span></b></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In late January, the Supreme Court did not issue a ruling on <i>Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump </i>which is the case that will decide the legality of the Administration using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) as justification for imposing tariffs on our trading partners. The next scheduled date for the Supreme Court to meet is later this week--February 20. The Administration has been consistent in its messaging that should the Supreme Court not rule in its favor, there are numerous other tools it may use to continue its tariff agenda. Among those tools are—</span></p> <ol start="1"> <li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.</b> <span style="background: white;">Grants the US Trade Representative power to retaliate against foreign trade practices deemed "unreasonable," discriminatory, or in violation of trade agreements that burden U.S. commerce. </span></span></li> <li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962.</b> There are numerous Section 232 investigations pending, including the robotics and industrial machinery 232 on which WIA submitted comments. Moreover, factoring in the inclusions process, 232 tariffs have the potential to be expansive, as long as a product contains steel, aluminum, copper, wood, semiconductors, critical minerals, or polysilicon; is an auto, truck, or plane part; or again is a robotic or industrial machinery. </span></li> <li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930. </b>This statute allows the President to impose tariffs on countries determined to have discriminated against U.S. commerce. The key here is that most countries have higher tariffs than the U.S. </span></li> <li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.</b> This law allows the President to impose tariffs up to 15% on imports for 150 days, subject to an extension by Congress. To take such an action there must be a “large and serious” balance of payment deficit; an “imminent and significant” dollar depreciation; or coordination with other countries to correct an “international balance-of-payments disequilibrium.” </span></li> <li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974</b>. Allows the President to impose tariffs for four years (with one four-year extension). Tariffs are capped at 50% and must phase down after a year. Section 201 tariffs were imposed during the first Trump Administration. However, the process is more complicated than Section 232, requiring International Trade Commission (USITC) public hearings and comments. So far, no Section 201s have been initiated, unlike the 232 space. </span></li> <li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).</b> It is in the realm of possibility that while tariff authority is struck down under IEEPA, other trade levers such as quotas and embargoes could be allowed. Also licensing fees may also be permissible under this statute. The President suggested to reporters recently that “licenses” should be a focus. </span></li> </ol> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The key question here is will Congress step in and try to reclaim some of its authority over tariffs and trade policy should the Administration continue to pursue an aggressive tariff policy. A $12 billion farm aid package was rolled out just before Christmas for the row crop producers whose markets have tanked in 2025 due to cratering tariff-related export demand. Another supplemental $15 billion proposal is now under negotiation to take care of specialty crops and others who were left out of the first tranche. Members of Congress are becoming anxious about the lack of trade deals that have been finalized and tariff “bailout fatigue” may be setting in which could prompt some more muscular intervention from Congress to moderate on the tariff front.<span>&nbsp; </span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Farm Bill</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On Friday, House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-PA) released Farm Bill reauthorizing language titled the Farm, Food and National Security Act of 2026. A committee markup of the measure is scheduled for February 23. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">There are number of provisions in the proposal for which WIA has been advocating. In the Forestry Title, <span>&nbsp;</span>the measure reauthorizes, renames and enhances the Community Wood Facilities Grant program which funds wood products manufacturing upgrades and bumps up the monetary level that could be awarded to individual facilities. It also reauthorizes and modernizes the Wood Innovation Grant program by reducing the non-federal match requirement, among other changes. WIG has been effective at helping stand up mass timber/cross laminated timber projects across the country. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In the Energy Title, the bill increases the loan amount level to $50 million under the Rural Energy for America Program and includes a number of other provisions that incentivize use of sawmill residuals for energy. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The committee will report the bill next week, but after that it faces an uncertain future. Republicans hold a razor thin majority in the House and, thus far, the Farm Bill rewriting process has not been a bipartisan exercise. Committee Ranking Member Angie Craig (D-MN) issued a statement Friday lambasting the measure as “failing to meet the moment” for farmers in that it does not address tariffs or include provisions to build markets for row crops, such as permitting year-round sales of E 15 gasoline. Moreover, the Senate Agriculture Committee has not produced a Farm Bill reauthorizing proposal and indications are that one is not forthcoming any time soon. WIA will keep you regularly apprised of progress on this process. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Transportation</span></b></span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">WIA is hearing that the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is planning to hold a markup of comprehensive surface transportation reauthorization legislation in March. Reauthorizing this measure, known as the Highway Bill, will provide the legislative vehicle for truck weight reform proposals. One of the bills in the mix for consideration is the Safe Routes Act (H.R. 2166/S. 1063) led by Rep. Tony Wied (R-WI). This legislation would allow trucks travelling from the timber harvesting site to the consuming mill at the maximum gross vehicle weight on state roads to access the interstate when it makes sense to do so. We also expect to see Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA) introduce the FRESH Act—Freight Restriction Elimination for Safer Hauling Act—any day now. This measure is a close cousin to Safe Routes but would apply to a larger universe of commodities. Inclusion of either one of these proposals in the surface transportation reauthorization measure would be a win for the forest products value chain. <span>&nbsp;</span>Both sponsors of the Safe Routes and FRESH Acts are members of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee which holds the pen on Highway Bill reauthorization. Finally, the Shippers Coalition will be introducing legislation to authorize a state pilot program to allow<span>&nbsp;</span>91,000-pound vehicles equipped with a 6<sup>th</sup> axle to travel on the interstate. This measure, aimed at trucks carrying finished products that often weigh out before they cube out, will also be under consideration for inclusion in the Highway Bill.</span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">We are picking up positive signals that truck weight reform language is under active consideration as staff looks to compile a “chairman’s mark” that will be the subject of the markup. Numerous committee members have weighed in to support Safe Routes and Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy—who was a sponsor of the bill when he served in the House—is also reportedly very active in negotiations with the Committee on substance in this bill. On the flip side, the Coalition Against Big Trucks was in town two weeks ago for its fly-in on Capitol Hill. This group is funded by the Class 1 railroads who have long opposed any truck size or weight reform. Of course, Safe Routes would not allow “bigger” trucks on the interstate, just those that are forced to travel all day every day on narrower, less safe state roads that intersect small towns and railroad crossings. This measure is a simple, common-sense tweak to an outdated, arbitrary 80,000-pound cap on our nation’s interstate highway system. Again, we will keep you apprised of developments.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">CTE Resolution</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On February 12, Representatives Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-PA) and Suzanne Bonamci (D-OR) were joined by Senators Tim Kaine (D-VA), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Ted Budd (R-NC) and Todd Young (R-IN) in introducing a Joint Resolution recognizing February as Career and Technical Education Month. The press release and statement from Members of Congress may be found <a href="https://thompson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/thompson-bonamici-kaine-budd-baldwin-young-introduce-resolution" target="_blank">here</a>.&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (January 2026)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=718373</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=718373</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">Congress</span></b></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">January marks the beginning of the second half of the 119<sup>th</sup> Congress. The first order of business is to pass the remaining Fiscal Year 2026 appropriations bills. Federal government funding runs out January 30 and while several appropriations measures have passed, there are a few key ones that have not been acted upon. This year presages to be a relatively short one legislatively speaking as the 2026 mid-term elections will be held in November and Members of Congress will be looking to spend more time than usual back in their states and districts to campaign. Expect a longer than normal August recess for the House and, currently, the Congressional calendar indicates that the House and Senate will not be in session for the entire month of October. That said, there are looming legislative deliverables that need attention, namely the Highway Bill which is up for reauthorization as it expires in September. Negotiations on this comprehensive bill are expected to include potential truck weight reform provisions which would allow heavier trucks to travel on our nation’s interstate highway system, a long-time priority for manufacturers looking to wring efficiencies out of their logistics and supply chains. As we have noted in previous updates, the Farm Bill is also on the table and the Fiscal Year 2027 appropriations cycle will kick off in earnest in March. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b></b></span><b style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Appropriations—Wood Innovation Grants and CTE</b></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b></b></span><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Last Thursday, the full Senate passed a three bill “minibus” appropriations package that includes the Fiscal Year 2026 Interior, Environment and Related Agencies appropriations bill. The vote was 82-15. The measure awaits the President’s signature.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">Notable for WIA, the bill funds the Community Wood Grant program at $15 million. Earlier versions of the legislation in the House were silent on Community Wood, meaning zero dollars for this program. So that is a win for Community Wood, an initiative that provides meaningful grants for sawmill upgrades and facilities that generate biomass heat and power.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">In addition, the legislation funds the Wood Innovation Grant program at $30 million. Authorizing and funding WIG has been a WIA priority as the program provides significant dollars to stand up innovative wood product manufacturing facilities across the country. Also notable is the bill reauthorizes a directive encouraging the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Department of Energy to recognize forest-based biomass energy as carbon neutral in any of their environmental or energy policymaking. And finally, the bill increases funding slightly for the Forest Inventory and Analysis program—a Forest Service tool that tracks the health and sustainability of our country’s forested acres.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">In other appropriations news, Congress has not yet finalized the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2026. House and Senate negotiators are working to finalize funding legislation before January 30, when the current Continuing Resolution funding federal government operations expires. The Senate version of the bill keeps funding level for the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education (Perkins) State Grant while the House version increases spending for this program by $25 million. Perkins is the main funding source for CTE programs across the country. Supporters are urging Congress to move forward with the increased funding level in the House bill, while also rejecting the House measure’s spending reductions in other areas that affect workforce development. A letter to Congress led by ACTE may be found <a href="https://www.acteonline.org/take-action-congressweb-embed/#/117" target="_blank">here</a>.&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span>Career and Technical Education</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span></span></b></span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">Earlier in January, the New Democrat Coalition unveiled its workforce and education agenda to “</span><span style="background: white; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">empower the next generation of American workers to achieve their potential with world-class K-12 education, concrete pathways to good-paying jobs, and robust support throughout their careers to adapt to the jobs of the future.” This coalition is a group of about 115 House Democrat Members of Congress that are center-left moderates known for working across the aisle on policy issues. A key plank in the agenda is around apprenticeships with the “New Dems” (as they are known) advocating the following--</span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><i><span style="background: white;">Grow non-college pathways to good jobs.</span></i></b></span></p> <ul style="list-style-type: disc;"> <li style="background: white;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><i>Scale earn-and-learn models and better integrate them into our workforce training infrastructure.</i></b></span></li> <ul style="list-style-type: circle;"> <li style="background: white;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><i>Expand the use of registered apprenticeships across key sectors of the economy by making registered apprenticeship programs easier to start and scale for employers while ensuring quality, rigor, as well as strong and enforceable labor standards and worker protections.</i></span></li> <li style="background: white;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><i>Better integrate pathways to registered apprenticeships into high school curriculum through vehicles like pre-apprenticeships and career and technical education programs, while maintaining strong and enforceable guardrails to prohibit youth on high-risk jobsites.</i></span></li> <li style="background: white;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><i>Invest in growing and replicating innovative, proven workforce models and pilot programs on a larger scale, focusing on bringing those models to rural and Tribal schools.</i></span></li> <li style="background: white;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><i>Ensure sustained funding to scale high-quality registered apprenticeships and other union-led training programs.</i></span></li> </ul> </ul> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">The vehicle for delivering on these goals is legislation reauthorizing the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act or WIOA. A WIOA reauthorizing measure almost became law at the end of the last Congress but failed at the 11<sup>th</sup> hour. We remain hopeful that a WIOA bill will materialize in the coming weeks and will be monitoring action closely.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span>Tax-100 Percent Bonus Depreciation</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">Last week, the Internal Revenue Service issued <a href="https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-26-11.pdf" target="_blank">guidance</a>&nbsp;for taxpayers looking to take advantage of the full expensing/100 percent bonus depreciation benefit that was reinstated under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) signed into law July 4 last year. Recall that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act had phased this benefit down to 40 percent in 2025 and would have eliminated it completely in 2027. OBBBA restored bonus depreciation to 100 percent and made the provision permanent. This guidance applies to property acquired and placed in service after January 19, 2025 and also includes transition provisions.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span>Trade</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to meet today and tomorrow to issue rulings on cases it is considering. One of these rulings could be on the legality of the Trump Administration’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) as the basis for its “Liberation Day” tariffs imposed on our trading partners earlier this year. The consolidated cases before the Supreme Court that will decide this issue are <i>VOS Selections Inc. v. Trump, Oregon v. Department of Homeland Security and Learning Resources v. Trump. </i>Should the Court rule against using IEEPA as a basis for imposing tariffs, the Administration has signaled that it does intend to use other channels to pursue its tariff agenda. We will keep you apprised of developments in this space.<span>&nbsp;</span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><strong>European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR):&nbsp;</strong></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">Late in December, the European Parliament approved another 1-year implementation delay of its controversial EUDR, which was slated to take effect December 30. The action includes a requirement for the European Commission to review the law for impacts to business and opportunities for additional simplification by April 30, 2026. As mentioned in previous policy updates, the EUDR is problematic for entities looking to sell forest products into the European Union as it requires exact geolocation identifying the source of the wood used to make the product. Currently, compliance with that aspect is unachievable for companies in all links of the forest products value chain.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">Among the key components of the measure are:</span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><strong>12-month implementation postponement for all operators:</strong> <span>A one-year delay for all operators and traders until December 30, 2026, with an additional six-month extension for micro and small operators (until June 2027). This eliminates the Commission’s proposed grace period for large companies, offering instead a single, clear extension applicable across the board.</span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><strong>Commission simplification review:</strong> <span>The Commission is tasked with conducting a simplification review by April 30, 2026, which will focus on reducing administrative burdens and proposing legislative amendments where necessary.</span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"></span><strong style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Streamlined due-diligence responsibilities within the EU:</strong><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"> Only the first downstream operator in the EU supply chain will be responsible for collecting and retaining the reference number of the initial due diligence statement. They will not be required to pass the numbers further down the chain.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span style="color: #000000;">In addition, the measure includes some compliance simplification measures for operators within the EU only. While these are EU-entity specific, this development is significant as it signals an EU commitment to consider additional modifications and establishes a formal avenue to advance changes.</span></span></span> </p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 14:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (December 2025)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=716677</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=716677</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Congress</span></b></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Both the House and the Senate are in session this week for the last time in 2025. The final act of legislative business for the year is passage of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), an annual must-pass measure that funds our nation’s military operations and readiness. Congress will return the first week of January with a laser focus on passing a tranche of Fiscal Year 2026 appropriations measures before the temporary government funding Continuing Resolution expires January 30. The government funding package the ended the federal government shut down in November included three Fiscal Year 2026 spending measures. The package that the Senate is looking to move in January includes another five bills, which would represent roughly 90 percent of all federal government operational funding. This is important as passage of these bills would likely take off the table the likelihood of another government shutdown in late January. If the Senate does not move these bills, the prospects of another federal government funding lapse increase exponentially, particularly if Congress also does not address Affordable Care Act subsidies that are expiring at the end of this month. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Farm Bill</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The process of rewriting and reauthorizing the Farm Bill, last updated in 2018, took an unusual turn this year. Partisan differences over spending levels, particularly for the nutrition title, resulted in only the largest spending-related Farm Bill items being included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) and signed into law. That action left the Farm Bill programs for which WIA advocates in limbo. House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn Thompson (R-PA) vowed to pursue a “Farm Bill 2.0” reauthorization package to address these orphan programs, but that effort never materialized. Instead, the remaining Farm Bill programs not reauthorized as part of the OBBBA were included in the federal government funding deal signed in November and extended through September 30, 2026. These programs include—</span></p> <ul style="list-style-type: square;"><li><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Wood Innovation Grant Program</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Community Wood Grant Program</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Forest Inventory and Analysis Program</span></li></ul> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Chairman Thompson and his team have signaled their intention to pursue a Farm Bill rewrite early in 2026. WIA will be working this process to include the programs above as well as additional items, namely the Jobs in the Woods Act provisions that we successfully included in the House Agriculture Committee-passed Farm Bill product in 2024. JWA is legislation that would stand up job training programs around the country tailored specifically for the wood products industry. It is based on a successful forest products job training program at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR)</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The European Parliament is scheduled to vote this week on another one-year delay in implementing its controversial product sourcing disclosure mandate known as EUDR. The measure applies to a number of commodities (cattle, cocoa, soy, palm oil, rubber, coffee) in addition to wood. Regarding the latter, the EUDR would require entities looking to sell into the EU market to provide the exact geolocation of where timber was harvested to make the wood or pulp and paper product. U.S. companies are unable to comply with the mandate and have been taking their case directly to EU officials, as well as Congress and the White House. As part of their advocacy, groups are arguing the that the U.S. should be labeled a “no risk” country under the measure as deforestation is not an issue here. According to the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. has more forested acres today than existed in the 1950s. It is unclear if the European Commission and Parliament will be open to changes to the law next year, but it appears all but certain that the December 30, 2025 implementation date will be pushed back one year. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Trade</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The first week of December, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) held a hearing as part of the 6-year review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). The law that codified the agreement was <span style="background: white;">signed by President Trump in January 2020 and requires USTR to finalize a report at least 180 days before top trade officials from the United States, Canada and Mexico meet on July 1 next year to determine whether they want to renew the pact for another 16-year term.</span> Based on that timeline, we should see report text sometime in early January. In terms of the report’s content, the USMCA law simply directs USTR to assess the agreement and make a recommendation on whether it should be extended. In addition, it calls upon the Trade Representative to lay out precisely what should be addressed in the 6-year review. </span></p> <p><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">If the three countries do not agree to renew the pact for 16 years, it would be put on a path to expire in June 2036, unless the countries resolve outstanding concerns before then and decide to extend it.</span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">A general theme of testimony at the hearing was that the overall framework of the USMCA agreement should be preserved, but that targeted updates to the pact be pursued. Areas of focus throughout the 2-day event were strengthening rules of origin, labor value content requirements and enforcement mechanisms.</span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In terms of enforcement, issues around transshipment and circumvention of Section 232 tariffs were flagged often during panelist testimony. Panelists from the steel and aluminum as well as forest products sectors cautioned that non-market economies like China are exploiting USMCA by routing raw materials and components through Canada and Mexico, where minimal processing or assembly qualifies them for preferential treatment under the agreement.&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The representative from the National Association of Manufacturers had this to say—</span></p> <p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><i><span style="letter-spacing: 0.4pt;">“The USMCA is foundational for manufacturing growth here at home. It expands sales opportunities throughout the North American market—and it strengthens our industry’s global competitiveness.”</span></i><span style="letter-spacing: 0.4pt;"> NAM’s testimony went on to note that Canada and Mexico purchase more than one-third of all American-made product exports and provide critical industrial inputs—materials, parts, machinery and equipment—that power American factories. Like other groups, NAM advocated for preserving the USMCA, but fine tuning the agreement in several areas. Specifically, the organization recommended--</span></span></p> <ul style="list-style-type: square;"><li><span style="letter-spacing: 0.4pt; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Further cutting red tape at the border;</span></li><li><span style="letter-spacing: 0.4pt; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Promoting greater use of USMCA preferences, including by reducing compliance costs; and</span></li><li><span style="letter-spacing: 0.4pt; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Addressing unfair competition by Mexico’s state-owned enterprises while shoring up protections for significant American investments in Mexico.</span></li></ul> <p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.4pt; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The other action it recommended is for the Administration to work with Canada and Mexico on regional economic security issues instead of leveling Section 232 tariffs. </span></p> <p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="letter-spacing: 0.4pt;">Workforce Development/CTE</span></b></span></p> <p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.4pt; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On December 9, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Employment (HELP) Committee held a hearing titled <i>Building Pathways: Advancing Workforce Development in the 21<sup>st</sup> Century. </i>Several familiar themes were underscored by the 4 panelists at the hearing. One CTE expert noted that c</span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">urrent estimates project that the total number of high school graduates will peak this year and steadily decline through 2041. At the same time, the U.S. has <span>&nbsp;</span>a rapidly aging population which is increasingly outpacing the growth of working-age adults. In manufacturing, this challenge has not only been recently quantified but will become even more urgent. Research from Deloitte and the Manufacturing Institute projects that between 2025 and 2033, the manufacturing sector will require 3.8 million new workers simply to keep pace with current and future needs. Yet up to 1.9 million of these positions may remain vacant without robust talent development strategies to support identifying new skilled talent. CTE presents an opportunity to close skills gaps while improving students' postsecondary and career readiness. </span></p> <p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">For policy considerations, several initiatives were mentioned. Among them were—</span></p> <ul style="list-style-type: square;"><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Strengthen the Federal Investment in Career and Technical Education:</b> Perkins V is the sole federal investment in CTE. Increased funding would ensure states, school districts and post-secondary institutions have the resources necessary to deliver high-quality CTE programming that meets the evolving needs of students and employers. This critical funding stream has not been meaningfully strengthened in two decades, having not kept up with inflation and growing learner demand that has emerged during this critical period in CTE’s modernization. </span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Expand Youth Work-Based Learning Opportunities:</b> Research consistently demonstrates that work-based learning experiences have powerful effects on student outcomes. Congress should support policies and funding that expand work-based learning opportunities for all youth, including skills competitions. Federal investments should recognize the full spectrum of work-based learning modalities, from career awareness activities in middle school through career preparation experiences like internships, apprenticeships and industry-validated competitive events in high school and beyond.</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Reauthorize the National Apprenticeship Act</b>: Congress should update and reauthorize the National Apprenticeship Act to formalize a predictable and sustained federal investment in youth, pre-apprenticeship and registered apprenticeship programs. Updated legislation should recognize the continuum of career preparation experiences and create clear pathways that connect secondary and post-secondary CTE with apprenticeship opportunities. </span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Grow the Pipeline of Skilled CTE Instructors:</b></span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"> To meet the nation’s workforce and economic demands, it is essential to strengthen and expand the pipeline of skilled CTE instructors. Congress should support policies that make teaching a competitive and compelling career path for experienced tradespeople and industry professionals. This includes offering salary incentives, earned debt relief opportunities and streamlined transition-to-teaching programs that help skilled experts bring their real-world experience into the classroom. </span></li></ul>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 17:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (November 2025)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=714694</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=714694</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="line-height: normal;"><b><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Government Funding</span></b></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Last Wednesday evening, the U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation (H.R. 5371) to end the longest government funding lapse in history—43 days. The vote was largely along party lines (222-209) and President signed the measure shortly thereafter. The bill extends funding for federal government operations through January 30, 2026, and includes full fiscal year 2026 appropriations for the Departments of Agriculture and Veterans Affairs, as well as Legislative Branch Operations. </span><span style="background: white; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The package buys Congress 11 more weeks to finalize funding negotiations<span>&nbsp; </span>on the remaining fiscal 2026 spending bills.&nbsp;To that end, the Senate plans to begin consideration this week of four appropriations bills reported out of committee earlier this year. These include Defense, Labor-HHS-Education, Commerce-Justice-Science and Transportation-HUD. Not yet on deck is the FY 2026 Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations bill, which funds critical programs such as the Wood Innovation and Community Wood Grant programs.</span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Farm Bill</b></span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The government funding deal also includes a one-year extension of the remaining provisions of the 2018 Farm Bill that were not reauthorized as part of the budget reconciliation Law (One Big Beautiful Bill Act or OBBBA) signed by the President July 4. Recall that the major policy and spending components that drive the Farm Bill rewriting process—row crop agriculture, dairy and nutrition programs—were enacted as part of OBBBA. Other provisions that do not enjoy mandatory funding were left out of that deal. For WIA, those include the Wood Innovation and Community Wood Grant programs, which provide critical funds to support innovative wood product manufacturing facilities (mass timber/cross laminated timber) across the country. These programs are now authorized through the end of the next fiscal year—September 30, 2026.</span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR)</b></span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">A draconian European Union (EU) law is set to take effect December 30 that would upend forest products industry supply chains in the U.S. and around the world. The core issue with the EUDR is that manufacturers wishing to sell into the EU market would have to provide information as to the exact location where wood was harvested to make the product. The law applies to anything from fluff pulp to dimensional lumber to wood pellets. For U.S. producers of forest products, complying the with geolocation mandate as it is known is currently not feasible. The law applies to other commodities as well, (namely cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm oil rubber and soy) but WIA has been monitoring developments as they pertain to wood products. </span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The law was supposed to take effect last December, but the EU passed a one-year delay. Advocates are now looking to secure another one-year reprieve with some language that would improve the existing law so that it is workable.<span>&nbsp; </span>A proposal is expected to be unveiled this week which would deliver on these objectives, but it still needs to be approved by the European Council, European Commission and ultimately Parliament. <span></span></span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Housing Legislation</b></span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Bipartisan legislation is pending in both the House and Senate that looks to increase housing starts and make home ownership more accessible. The legislation (S. 1686 and H.R. 2854) is the <i>Neighborhood Homes Investment Act (NHIA) </i>and is led by Senator Todd Young<i> </i>(R-IN) and Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA). </span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In many areas of the country, the cost to build or rehab a home exceeds the price at which the home could be sold once completed. The NHIA establishes a new tax credit which would help fill that “value gap” for developers, thus reducing their risk of loss and encouraging investments in new and rehabbed housing. The goal for this tax credit is to make homeownership more feasible and support broader revitalization and economic development strategies in disinvested urban and rural communities. The Neighborhood Coalition—one of the supporters of the bill--estimates that, if enacted, NHIA could result in 500,000 new starter homes nationwide.</span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Because NHIA focuses exclusively on single to 4-family unit structures, the impact on dimensional lumber and other wood products manufacturers could be considerable. Depending on the type of home built, Forest Economic Advisors estimates that this bill alone could result in additional 7 billion to 10 billion board feet of demand.</span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Career and Technical Education (CTE)</b></span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The theater has been relatively quiet on the workforce development/CTE front. However, on Wednesday, November 19, the House Education and Workforce Committee’s Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary and Secondary Education will hold a hearing titled <i>“From Classroom to Career: Strengthening Skills Pathways Through CTE.</i> WIA will be on hand for the hearing.</span></p> <p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Last year, Congress came close to reauthorizing the bedrock statute that underpins our workforce development infrastructure in the U.S. This is the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) that has not been updated since 2014.<span>&nbsp;</span>Bipartisan interest in WIOA reform and reauthorization exists as evidenced by hearings earlier in the year in the House and Senate that focused on WIOA improvements that would address challenges in connecting job seekers with available opportunities. A Stronger Workforce for America Act remains the focal point of discussions, including provisions to:</span></p> <ul style="list-style-type: square;"><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Dedicate 50 percent of funding to skills training and supportive services</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Establish "critical industry skills funds" for upskilling workers in priority industries</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Enhance employer partnerships and streamline program accountability</span></li></ul> <p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Congress has also expressed strong interest in improving workforce data collection systems, which would allow states to better align training programs with labor market needs. </span></p> <p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 19:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (October 2025)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=712839</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=712839</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Government Funding</b></span></p><p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The federal government shutdown now enters its third week with more votes scheduled in the coming days on the House-passed Continuing Resolution. Republican and Democrat leaders remain far apart in negotiations thus far. The Capitol complex is fully accessible and WIA continues to meet with staff on our key priorities. The Senate is in session, while the House remains in recess. </span></p><p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Trade</b></span></p><p style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">WIA filed comments last week on the Section 232 Investigation into the national security impacts of imports of robotics and industrial machinery. Those comments may be found <a href="https://woodindustry.org/resource/resmgr/washington_report/issues/2025/roboticsandindustrialmachin.docx" target="_blank">here</a>. The Federal Register notice announcing the investigation and inviting comments noted that the<span>&nbsp;</span>investigation would include robots and programmable, computer-controlled mechanical systems, such as Computer Numerical Controlled (CNC) machining centers, turning and milling machines, grinding and deburring equipment, and industrial stamping and pressing machines. The investigation also includes automatic tool changers, jigs and fixtures, and machine tools for cutting, welding, and handling work pieces.</span></p><p style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The notice included a number of questions on which commenters were asked to opine. </span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Specifically, Commerce is seeking information on domestic production and demand, the role and risks of major foreign exporters and the impact of foreign government subsidies and trade practices on the robotics and industrial machinery market. The questions also probe into the effects of current trade policies related to robotics and industrial equipment and whether further measures, such as tariffs and quotas, are needed to protect national security. The impact of robotics and industrial machinery on U.S. manufacturing employment and whether the supply chain for such goods is susceptible to foreign exploitation or control are also areas of interest.</span></p><p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In other 232 developments, late last month<span> the Trump Administration announced the completion of its Section 232 national security investigation into lumber, timber and derivative products which was originally opened in March. The Administration, in conjunction with the Department of Commerce, determined that wood products are being imported into the United States in such quantities and in such manner that it is affecting national security. As a result, President Trump is imposing a 10% tariff on softwood lumber; a 25% tariff on certain upholstered furniture that will increase to 30% on January 1st; and a 25% tariff on kitchen cabinets and vanities, which will increase to 50% on January 1st. </span></span></p><p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">We expect to see the report from Commerce soon as well as formal Federal Register guidance, consistent with previous 232 investigation announcement rollouts.&nbsp;<br /></span></p><p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Other notable items are:</span></p><ul style="list-style-type: square;"><li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Trading partners who negotiate with the United States to address the threat of wood imports to the national security of the United States may be able to secure an alternative to the pending tariff increases.</span></li><li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The United Kingdom, the European Union, and Japan will enjoy more favorable treatment that reflects the terms of their trade deals with the United States.</span><ul><li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The Section 232 tariff on subject wood imports from the United Kingdom will not exceed 10%.</span></li><li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The combined Section 232 tariff and most-favored nation tariff on subject wood imports from the European Union and Japan will not exceed 15%.</span></li></ul></li><li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Products that are not subject to these Section 232 tariffs will generally be subject instead to reciprocal tariffs.</span></li><li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The treatment of products on the list of Potential Tariff Adjustments for Aligned Partners (PTAAP) remains unchanged unless an antidumping or countervailing duty order applies.</span></li><li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Imports of hardwood do not appear to be impacted unless it is included as a component of furniture or cabinets.&nbsp;</span></li></ul><p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The fact sheet may be found <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/09/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-addresses-the-threat-to-national-security-from-imports-of-timber-lumber-and-their-derivative-products-e810/" target="_blank">here</a>.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Fix our Forests Act</b></span></p><p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee this week is considering the Fix Our Forests Act (S. 1462)—comprehensive federal forestry legislation to promote active management of our federally-owned forested landscapes. Among other items, the bill would—</span></p><ul style="list-style-type: square;"><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Simplify and expedite environmental reviews for forest management projects</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Make communities more resilient to wildfires by better coordinating existing grant programs and promoting new research</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Promote federal, state, tribal and local collaboration</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Deter frivolous litigation that delays essential forest management projects</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Create a framework for prioritizing treatments in the forests at the highest risk of wildfire and near vulnerable communities</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Encourage the adoption of state-of-the-art science and techniques for federal land managers</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Encourage active management to improve the safety of powerlines and other infrastructure</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Strengthen existing forest management tools like Good Neighbor Authority and Stewardship Contracting</span></li></ul><p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Similar legislation passed the House last year. </span></p><p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Trade Relief for Forestry and Timber Sectors</b></span></p><p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Rep. Kat Cammack (R-FL) is leading a letter in the House (<a href="https://woodindustry.org/resource/resmgr/washington_report/issues/2025/quill_-_letter__l29809_-_let.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>) that advocates for including forestry and timber in any upcoming trade assistance package that the Administration develops. President Trump and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Brooke Rollins have been signaling in recent days that an aid package is under development to provide economic relief to soybean farmers and other row crop agriculture producers that have seen foreign markets erode this year. WIA is hearing from our contacts in the White House and at USDA that an aid package will be unveiled shortly after the federal government shutdown ends.</span></p><p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">&nbsp;</span></p><p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">&nbsp;</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><br /></span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (September 2025)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=710149</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=710149</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Government Funding</span></b></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"> Both Houses of Congress are in session this week as lawmakers scramble to forge a deal on a government spending measure that would keep federal government agencies and departments open after the end of this month. House and Senate leaders are exploring options on a Continuing Resolution (CR) to buy more time for negotiations on a longer-term FY 2026 appropriations package. In the House, GOP leadership is floating a “clean” CR that would extend government funding through November 20. This may be paired with a 3 bill “minibus” appropriations package that would appropriate full year funds for several departments and agencies. House and Senate Democrat leaders have signaled that they would be on board with this approach if the CR includes extension of enhanced insurance subsidies under the Affordable Care Act, which may be a non-starter for some GOP members. House votes on a short-term CR are expected later this week.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Right now, both chambers are scheduled to be in recess next week, so the next few days will be critical in stopgap funding negotiations.</span></p> <p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Trade</span></b></span></p> <p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On September 9, the Supreme Court announced that it will take up the issue of whether the Administration’s imposition of tariffs on U.S. trading partners is legal under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On August 29, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in a 7-4 decision that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose sweeping tariffs on nearly all imported goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners. The Administration has appealed this decision and the Supreme Court announced that it will hear arguments beginning in early November. The tariffs will remain in place until the Supreme Court rules on the matter.</span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"> </span></p> <p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In other trade news, President Trump announced late last month that his Administration is conducting a “major Tariff Investigation on Furniture coming into the United States.” The post on Truth Social went on to say: "Within the next 50 days, that Investigation will be completed, and Furniture coming from other Countries into the United States will be Tariffed at a Rate yet to be determined. This will bring the Furniture Business back to North Carolina, South Carolina, Michigan, and States all across the Union. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"> Indications are that the President was referring to the ongoing Section 232 investigation into lumber, timber and derivative products and their potential national security impacts on imports of these products. This investigation was initiated March 1, and his announcement suggests that furniture will be a point of emphasis of the initiative.</span></p><p style="line-height: 140%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">WIA has been hearing from Administration officials that results of this Section 232 investigation would be unveiled any day. As soon as we see the report, we will have an analysis for you.</span><span style="line-height: 140%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"> </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Regulatory</b></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Earlier this month, the Trump Administration unveiled its first regulatory agenda for its second term. Known as the Unified Regulatory Agenda, this document previews the Administration’s priorities for all of the regulatory agencies and departments. The link to the agenda is here: <a href="https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain" target="_blank">Spring Agenda</a></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Notable among the actions is a planned revisitation of the 2024 rule that tightened the fine particulate matter standard from 12 parts per cubic microgram to 9. That action brings large swaths of the country into nonattainment for this pollutant, which subsequently restricts economic activity in those areas. The agenda also signals that the Administration plans on repealing the greenhouse gas emissions standards for electric utilities and establishing a new definition of “Waters of the U.S.” Also notable is the Administration intends to pursue a heat illness and prevention rule, although it is unclear what types of requirements on employers are being contemplated.</span></p> <p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">For the Department of the Interior, modifications for listing endangered and threatened species are in the queue as are changes to how critical habitat is designated. And finally, repeal of the roadless rule is listed under USDA’s planned regulatory actions. This rule, which has been on the books since 2001, established prohibitions on road construction, road reconstruction and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas on National Forest System lands.</span></p> <p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Farm Bill</span></b></span></p> <p style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">WIA met personally with House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn Thompson (R-PA) at a mill tour in Northern Pennsylvania in late August. The discussion ranged from trade and tariffs to the Farm Bill. Regarding the latter, Chairman Thompson indicated he will be pushing hard to move a Farm Bill 2.0 in September. Recall that the commodity title programs (row crop, dairy) were addressed in the budget reconciliation bill signed July 4. The roughly 20 percent of the Farm Bill left unaddressed is what will be included in this follow-up Farm Bill effort. WIA priorities such as the Wood Innovation and Community Wood grant programs, as well as the Forest Inventory and Analysis program will be part of this fall’s Farm Bill negotiations. Chairman Thompson indicated that he is exploring the possibility of using tariff-derived revenue to fund his Farm Bill. 2.0 proposal. Details on the amount and whether this is an option remain unclear, but we will have a better understanding of the situation in the coming days. </span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (August 2025)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=708322</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=708322</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">Congress</span></b>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">Members of Congress have left town for the month of August after an action packed first seven months of the 119<sup>th</sup> Congress. When they return to town September 2, they will be facing an immediate deadline to fund the government past September 30. That is when the current Continuing Resolution (CR) expires. While both chambers have moved on some appropriations measures, the likelihood of acting on all 12 appropriations bills before the end of September is near zero. That means another CR will be required. At this writing, odds of a government shutdown appear high related to partisan divide over a recent Democrat-opposed “rescissions” package that was enacted that claws back about $9 billion in already appropriated funds. This action followed closely on the heels of the budget reconciliation bill that was also passed despite unified Democrat opposition. A government funding CR will require 60 votes in the U.S. Senate, meaning a handful of Senate Democrats will have to vote for it. Given that Minority Leader Schumer is still taking heat from his caucus for agreeing to the last CR in March and averting a shutdown, the table appears set for a government funding lapse of some duration.</span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">Assuming that a CR comes together at some point, the measure may include an extension of certain Farm Bill programs. <span style="background: white;">While the budget reconciliation bill that was signed into law July 4 addresses major parts of the Farm Bill in areas such as commodity support, crop insurance, conservation and food assistance, it did not include the programs we care about. House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-PA) has signaled his desire to move a “skinny” Farm Bill out of his committee that would reauthorize these remaining programs in September. The skinny bill would include the Community Wood and Wood Innovation Grant programs, the Forest Inventory and Analysis program, and workforce provisions to help the forestry and forest products sectors.</span></span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Wood Markets/Mass Timber</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">In late July, Senators Jim Justice (R-WV), Steve Daines (R-MT), Raphael Warnock (D-GA) and Martin Heinrich (D-NM) introduced the Forest Bioeconomy Act. This bipartisan legislation directs the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), along with the Department of Energy (DOE), to expand research on the uses of low value commercial timber to support new wood products markets, sustain the wood products manufacturing sector and explore the viability/scalability of using wood and biomass as a feedstock for sustainable fuel.</span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">A centerpiece of the bill would create a dedicated Office of Technology Transfer at the Forest Service to expand its commercialization of research findings and support the development of products using Forest Service research. The legislation also establishes a mass timber science and education program under the Forest Service. The program would be specifically targeted at responding to the needs of architects, real estate developers and the forest products industry. The program would, for example, connect researchers with private industry to make improvements in mass timber construction techniques for improved wildfire performance, structural stability and energy use. This research would complement the existing Wood Innovations Grant (WIG) program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">A press release announcing the bill’s introduction may be found <a href="https://www.justice.senate.gov/press-releases/senators-justice-daines-heinrich-warnock-introduce-the-forest-bioeconomy-act/" target="_blank">here</a>.</span></span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Trade</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">At 12:01 on August 7, new tariffs were imposed on about 90 countries ranging in rates from 10 to 50 percent. Products from the European Union, Japan and South Korea will be taxed at 15 percent, while imports from Taiwan, Vietnam and Bangladesh will be taxed at 20 percent. A special tariff rate of 50 percent will be imposed on India in about 3 weeks as punishment for India’s procurement of oil from Russia. The overall U.S. tariff rate is at its highest in almost a century. </span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">Regarding trade with China, last Monday the President signed an executive order extending the tariff regime on China for another 90 days. The existing 90-day tariff truce was scheduled to expire the following day. That expiration date is now November 10. The EO heads off escalation of tariffs—now capped at 30 percent on Chinese imports and 10 percent on US goods—in an apparent effort to prevent economic disruption as we enter the critical holiday trading season.</span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">Without the extension, US duties on Chinese goods could have jumped to 145 percent, while China’s retaliatory tariffs might have risen to 125 percent, effectively approaching a trade embargo. </span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">The EO may be found <a href="https://woodindustry.org/resource/resmgr/washington_report/2025chinasuspensionextension.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">Sectors across the economy have been raising with the Administration the issue of manufacturing component parts that cannot be sourced within the U.S and whether tariff exemptions in these instances would be considered. Officials appear to understand that <span style="line-height: 115%;">this is a legitimate claim and that supply chains are global and not confined to the U.S. However, no clear commitments on a tariff exemption process have been made. </span></span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Department of Agriculture Reorganization Plan</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">On July 24, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins unveiled a long-awaited reorganization plan for her department. The memo<span> </span></span>
    <a
        href="https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/sm-1078-015.pdf?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery" target="_blank"><span style="line-height: 115%;">View the Secretary Memorandum</span></a><span style="line-height: 115%;"> indicates that more than half of the 4,600 employees in the Washington, D.C. area will be moved out of the region and into one of 5 hubs around the country—Raleigh, NC; Kansas City, MO; Indianapolis, IN; Fort Collins, CO and Salt Lake City, UT. In addition, the Department will hold on to the Whitten Building where the Secretary’s office is located and the Yates Building where the Forest Service is housed but will vacate the sizable South building along Independence Avenue across from the Whitten Building. Notably, the 9 Forest Service regional offices will be phased out over the next year.<span></span></span>
        </span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Greenhouse Gas Regulation</span></b><span style="line-height: 115%;"><br />  <br /> Last month, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin unveiled his Agency’s proposal to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding. This was a landmark rulemaking during the Obama Administration that requires the Environmental Protection Agency to take action under the Clean Air Act to curb emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and four other air pollutants from vehicles, power plants, and other industries. The EPA’s Endangerment Finding followed the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, holding that greenhouse gases are air pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act.<br />  <br /> The Endangerment Finding provided the basis for a panoply of greenhouse gas emissions regulations, including the electric vehicle mandate and emissions regulations for coal-fired and natural gas-fueled power plants.</span></span>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Workforce</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span> <span style="line-height: 115%;">In late July before Congress left town for the August recess, Representatives Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA-03) and David Rouzer (R-NC-07) introduced the Jobs in the Woods Act (H.R. 4575) to address critical workforce shortages in the forestry and forest products sector and invest in the next generation of professionals in this value chain. Original House Cosponsors include Reps. Pete Stauber (R-MN-08), Chellie Pingree (D-ME-01), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA-01), and Glenn Thompson (R-PA-15).</span></span>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span><span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">The bill would authorize grants of between $500,000 and $2 million to stand up workforce </span></span>
    </span>
    </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">training modules tailored specifically for the forestry and wood products manufacturing sectors. Grants would be available to nonprofit organizations, state agencies and colleges. It is based on a successful program run by the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, and its goal is to promote similar programs in regions across the country.  </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri; line-height: 115%;"><span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; line-height: 115%;"><span style="color: #000000;"> <span style="line-height: 115%;">Senate companion legislation (S. 1336) was introduced in April 2025 by Senators Angus King (I-ME) and Jim Risch (R-ID), making this measure not only bipartisan, but bicameral. </span></span>
    </span>
    </span>
    </span>
</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (July 2025)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=705877</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=705877</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Trade</span></b></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">On July 7, President Trump signed an Executive Order </span><a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/07/extending-the-modification-of-the-reciprocal-tariff-rates/?utm_source=773140&amp;utm_medium=email" target="_blank"><span style="background: white;">executive order</span></a><span style="background: white;"> extending the deadline for forging trade deals with competing countries from July 9 to August 1. The action </span><span style="background: white;">effectively extends the baseline additional 10 percent “reciprocal” tariff on all countries (except Mexico, Canada and China) until August. This pause is an extension of the original pause in the “reciprocal” tariffs that were announced on April 2. The pause has been in place since April 9.</span></span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="background: white; font-family: Arial;">The President sent letters to 14 countries that have not yet come to the table to negotiate a new trade agreement with the U.S. You can see the list of countries contacted and the new tariff rates </span>
    <a href="https://cdn.statcdn.com/Infographic/images/normal/34776.jpeg" target="_blank"><span style="background: white;">here</span></a><span style="background: white;">.</span></span>
</p>
<p><span style="background: white; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Although the White House has signaled that trade agreements are being forged, no new trade deals have been announced. The White House has hinted that some deals may be revealed in the coming days.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On July 12th, President Trump announced that letters had been issued to both the European Union and Mexico, notifying them of the United States' intent to impose 30% import tariffs beginning August 1st. The President also indicated that negotiations remain possible, suggesting the door is still open for alternative trade agreements. In response, the European Union has stated it will postpone any retaliatory action until at least August 6th.</span></p>
<p style="line-height: 140%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="background: white; line-height: 140%;">Hearing on Forest Service Budget</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee held a hearing last week on the U.S. Forest Service’s Fiscal Year 2026 budget. The proposed budget reduces funding for Forest Service functions and delegates wildfire management to the Interior Department. Forest Service Chief Tom Shultz was the sole witness.</span></p>
<p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">During questioning, Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) asked Chief Shultz if the Forest Service would prioritize implementation of language in the recently enacted budget reconciliation legislation to increase timber production on federal lands. Chief Shultz responded that the USFS would take steps necessary to ensure that an increase of 250 million board feet of timber is produced from federal lands year over year going forward.<span>&nbsp; </span></span>
</p>
<p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Farm Bill</b></span></p>
<p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn Thompson (R-PA) appears to have moved off his goal of marking up Farm Bill reauthorization legislation before the August recess. He had signaled to committee staff in late June that he wanted to proceed on a Farm Bill markup in late July. He is now signaling that his committee will try to proceed in mid-September. The WIA team continues to advocate for full funding and authorization of the Wood Innovation and Community Wood grant programs, as well as a robust Forest Inventory and Analysis program and inclusion of Jobs in the Woods Act provisions. <span></span></span>
</p>
<p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Tax Recap</b></span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In early July, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 1, the budget reconciliation bill containing GOP policy priorities, by a vote of 218-14. It was sent to the President, who signed the measure into law on July 4.<span>&nbsp; </span></span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">As we have noted during the process, the legislation revives and makes permanent key business tax incentives, including the research and development tax credit which expired in 2022. The 100 percent bonus depreciation benefit which has been phasing out is also made permanent. In addition, the 20 percent deduction for S-Corporations and other pass-through entities was also made permanent. That benefit was slated to expire at the end of 2025. </span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Other items of interest include—</span></p>
<ul style="list-style-type: square;">
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><strong><span style="background: white; padding: 0in; border: 1pt none windowtext;">Sec. 179 expensing:</span></strong><span style="background: white;">&nbsp;Increases the maximum amount a taxpayer may expense under Sec. 179 to $2.5 million, reduced by the amount by which the cost of qualifying property exceeds $4 million.</span></span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><strong><span style="background: white; padding: 0in; border: 1pt none windowtext;">EBITDA:</span></strong> Restores the more favorable EBITDA standard for calculating interest deductibility.
        The current standard is EBIT.</span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"></span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b>Estate Tax:</b> Permanently increases the estate tax exemption to $15 million beginning in tax year 2026. This amount is indexed for inflation thereafter.</span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="background: white;">State and Local Tax (SALT) Deduction:</span></b><span style="background: white;"> Provides a temporary new SALT deduction cap of $40,000, beginning in 2025. This cap phases out at a rate of 30 percent of adjusted gross income over $500,000, to a minimum cap of $10,000. Starting in 2026, the applicable cap and phase-out thresholds grow by 1 percent each year through 2029. In 2030, the cap reverts permanently to a maximum of $10,000.</span></span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="background: white;">International Provisions:</span></b><span style="background: white;"> Permanently maintains the section 250 deduction and effective statutory tax rates on global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) and foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) close to their current levels (they&nbsp;would increase in 2026 under current law) and makes other changes to the taxation of multinational businesses.</span></span>
    </li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In addition to the tax provisions, there is language in the measure addressing federal forest management and timber production. These provisions do the following--</span></p>
<ul style="list-style-type: square;">
    <li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Requires that the U.S. Forest Service award no fewer than 40 long-term timber contracts to private individuals or public/private entities during fiscal years 2025 through 2034. The intent is to enhance supply predictability for the forest products industry. However, the provision has drawn scrutiny from some stakeholders who caution that it may limit competition by concentrating access among fewer market participants.&nbsp;</span></li>
    <li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">For each fiscal year from 2026 through 2034, the Forest Service shall annually sell timber from National Forest System lands at a volume at least 250 million board feet greater than the volume sold in the preceding fiscal year. However, the total annual sale may not exceed the allowable sale quantity.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">To offset costs associated with H.R. 1, the legislation eliminates the following clean energy credits—</span></p>
<ul style="list-style-type: circle;">
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Sec. 25E previously owned clean vehicle credit (terminated after Sept. 30, 2025)</span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Sec. 30D clean vehicle credit (terminated for vehicles acquired after Sept. 30, 2025)</span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Sec. 45W qualified commercial clean vehicle credit (terminated after Sept. 30, 2025)</span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Sec. 30C alternative fuel vehicle refueling credit (terminated after June 30, 2026)</span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Sec. 25C energy-efficient home improvement credit (terminated after Dec. 31, 2025)</span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Sec. 25D residential clean energy credit (terminated for expenditures made after Dec. 31, 2025)</span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Sec. 179D energy-efficient commercial buildings deduction (terminated for property the construction of which begins after June 30, 2026)</span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Sec. 45L new energy-efficient home credit (terminated after June 30, 2026)</span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Sec. 45V clean hydrogen production credit (terminated after Jan. 1, 2028) </span></li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Sec. 6426(k) sustainable aviation fuel credit (terminated after Sept. 30, 2025)</span></li>
</ul>
<p style="line-height: 125%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><strong><span style="line-height: 125%;">Transportation - FMCSA Policy on Driver Language Proficiency Enforcement</span></strong>
    </span>
</p>
<p style="line-height: 125%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 125%;"> As of June 25, 2025, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) will begin strict enforcement of the longstanding requirement that commercial drivers must be able to read and speak English. This follows an April 2025 Executive Order that rescinds a 2016 interpretation, allowing for more discretion in enforcement.<br /> <br /> Key changes include:</span></span>
</p>
<ul style="list-style-type: disc;">
    <li style="color: #222222; line-height: 125%;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">Mandatory roadside English assessments with no interpreters or translation tools allowed.</span></span>
    </li>
    <li style="color: #222222; line-height: 125%;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">Drivers unable to converse or read road signs will be placed out-of-service immediately.</span></span>
    </li>
    <li style="color: #222222; line-height: 125%;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">FMCSA is also reviewing CDL issuance to non-domiciled drivers for compliance.</span></span>
    </li>
</ul>
<p style="line-height: 125%;"><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">This shift signals a heightened regulatory emphasis on language competency as a safety requirement. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (June 2025)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=703751</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=703751</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Tax/Budget Reconciliation</span></b></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On Monday evening, the Senate Finance Committee unveiled its portion of the budget reconciliation bill. Finance is the panel that is in charge of fashioning the tax provisions in the comprehensive measure. The text tracks largely along the lines of what we were expecting, with a few deviations. Provisions in the text of concern to WIA are the following—</span></p>
<ul style="list-style-type: square;">
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span>100 percent bonus deprecation/full expensing:</span></b><span> As expected the bill not only restores this tax benefit allowing businesses to immediately expense 100 percent of capital investments in machinery and equipment but makes this provision permanent. Recall that the House-passed bill only extends full expensing for 5 years. </span></span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span>Research & Development (R&D) Credit:</span></b><span> The Senate’s text restores this tax benefit that expired in 2022, which up until that year, allowed businesses to fully write off their R&D costs in the same year in which those costs were incurred. As with full expensing, the Senate also opted to make this benefit permanent. The House-passed bill only extended it for 5 years. </span></span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span>Section 199A:</span></b><span> The Senate Finance Committee’s text, like the House, makes the 20 percent deduction for S-Corporations and other pass-through structures permanent. However, the House opted to bump this number up to 23 percent. The Senate holds it at 20 percent. </span></span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span>Section 179</span></b><b><span>:</span></b><span> Like the House, t<span style="background: white;">he proposal increases the maximum amount a business may write off certain expenses to $2.5 million and increases the phaseout threshold amount to $4 million.</span></span>
        </span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span>EBITDA:</span></b><span> The Senate mirrors the House approach in restoring EBITDA as the measure for calculating business interest expense. The current standard established by TCJA is EBIT, which is not as generous and serves to make companies less competitive, particularly in a high interest rate environment.</span></span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span>Estate and Gift Tax Exemption:</span></b><span> Like the House, the Senate bill permanently increases </span><span style="background: white;">basic estate and gift tax exemption amount and the generation-skipping transfer tax exemption to $15 million. </span></span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span>State and Local Tax (SALT) Deduction:</span></b><span> The Senate opted to keep the current $10,000 cap on the SALT deduction, deviating from the House approach which raised it to $40,000. </span></span>
    </li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Senate leaders hope to have the combined budget reconciliation package on the Senate floor next week to align with their goal of passing the bill through the upper chamber before the July 4 recess. That deadline seems like a stretch goal at this point however, as several GOP Senators have voiced concern with various provisions. Leadership also would prefer to avoid a formal conference committee with the House and so negotiations over the SALT issue and others will be front and center in the coming days. Senate Republicans do not like the House approach to<span></span>SALT,
    but the handful of GOP lawmakers in the House from high SALT states have indicated that the $40,000 cap is nonnegotiable.<span>  </span></span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span>European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR)</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Earlier this month, staff from the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce and the U.S. Trade Representative hosted a roundtable to discuss forestry and forest product sector value chain concerns around compliance with the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR). The discussion focused on a number of areas, particularly the inability for U.S. producers to meet EUDR’s strict geolocation requirements. The EUDR requires any wood or pulp and paper company selling into the EU market to identify down to the exact parcel where timber to make those products is harvested. Wood products manufacturers have been advocating with the Administration that this is a non-tariff trade barrier which needs to be addressed in the context of the ongoing trade negotiations with the European Union. WIA will keep you apprised of developments. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span>Trade </span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">On June 3, the White House announced that it would raise tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum and derivative products to 50 percent beginning <span></span>June
    4 for all countries except the UK. The White House announcement may be found <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/06/adjusting-imports-of-aluminum-and-steel-into-the-united-states/ " target="_blank">here</a>. </span><span><span></span>Estimates
    are that this action will result in $50 billion in tariff costs, effectively doubling the estimated impact of tariffs announced in March. </span>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In other trade news earlier this month, President Trump announced that his negotiating team had reached a tentative deal with China on trade between the two countries. According to the Administration, tariffs on imports from China would be locked in at 55 percent, while China would impose a 10 percent tariff on U.S. goods entering the Chinese marketplace.</span></p>
<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">WIA Members Descend on Washington</span></b></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Next week, a group of executives from WIA member companies will decamp to Washington, D.C. to advocate in support of our sector’s public policy priorities. Trade and tariffs will be top of mind, as will the tax bill which may be on the Senate floor the day our group is on Capitol Hill. We will also be discussing workforce challenges and the need for action on workforce development. Finally, we have some Farm Bill programs that we will be discussing with Members of Congress and their staff. The group will be divided into three teams and will have about 30 meetings over the course of the day on June 25.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">If you have specific issues you would like raised next week, please let WIA staff know. </span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (May 2025)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=701569</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=701569</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Tax</span></b></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">This morning, </span>the House of Representatives voted 215-214 to advance a comprehensive budget reconciliation bill that encompasses GOP policy priorities.
    As we noted in our previous updates, the legislation includes robust tax provisions that revive and extend key business tax benefits, including full expensing, the research and development tax credit and the Section 199A deduction for S-Corporations
    and pass throughs. To pay for these provisions and others, the measure cuts spending for Medicaid and food assistance programs in addition to eliminating renewable energy tax credits authorized by the Inflation Reduction Act.</span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">Key business tax benefit provisions included in the bill are—</span></span>
</p>
<ul style="list-style-type: square;">
    <li><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">100 percent bonus deprecation/full expensing:</span></b>
        </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%;"> Language allows taxpayers to immediately expense 100 percent of capital investments in machinery and equipment made on or after January 20, 2025, and before January 1, 2030. House GOP leaders entered the reconciliation process hoping to extend this benefit permanently but opted for a 5-year extension based on cost concerns. We understand there is a strong appetite in the Senate to modify this provision to make it permanent. </span></span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Research & Development (R&D) Credit:</span></b>
        </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%;"> The provision allows taxpayers to fully write off their R&D costs in the same year in which those costs are incurred. Recall, this benefit expired in 2022. The bill makes the R&D credit retroactive to January 1, 2025, and extends it through December 31, 2030. Again, the Senate is interested in making this benefit permanent. </span></span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Section 199A:</span></b>
        </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">The 20 percent deduction for S-Corporations and other pass-through structures expires at the end of this year. This benefit would not only be made permanent, but it is also increased to 23 percent. </span></span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Section 179</span></b>
        </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">:</span></b>
        </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%;"> <span style="background: white;">The proposal increases the maximum amount a business may write off certain expenses to $2.5 million and increases the phaseout threshold amount to $4 million.</span></span>
        </span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">EBITDA:</span></b>
        </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%;"> The bill restores EBITDA as the measure for calculating business interest expense. The current standard established by TCJA is EBIT, which is not as generous and serves to makecompanies less competitive, particularly in a high interest rate environment.</span></span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="padding: 0in; border: 1pt none windowtext; line-height: 115%;">FDII and GILTI:</span></b>
        </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%;"> Under the TCJA, after 2025, the foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) deduction was scheduled to be reduced from 37.5% of FDII to 21.875%, and the global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) inclusion deduction amount was scheduled to be reduced from 50% to 37.5% under Sec. 259(a)(3). The bill would repeal those reductions.</span></span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="padding: 0in; border: 1pt none windowtext; line-height: 115%;">BEAT tax:</span></b>
        </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%;"> Under Sec. 59A, the base-erosion and anti-abuse (BEAT) tax is scheduled to increase from 10% to 12.5% after 2025, and regular tax liability will be reduced (and the BEAT minimum tax amount therefore increased) by the sum of all the taxpayer’s income tax credits for the tax year. The bill would eliminate that increase and the provision reducing regular tax liability by the sum of the taxpayer’s tax credits.</span></span>
        <p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%;"> </span></span>
        </p>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Estate and Gift Tax Exemption:</span></b>
        </span> <span><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%;">The basic estate and gift tax exemption amount and the generation-skipping transfer tax exemption would be permanently increased to $15 million. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) had temporarily increased it to $10 million (adjusted for inflation), but that increase is expiring next year. The $15 million exemption amount would be indexed for inflation after 2025.</span></span>
        </span>
    </li>
    <li><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">State and Local Tax (SALT) Deduction:</span></b>
        </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%;"> Language in the bill raises the SALT deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,000. </span></span>
    </li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">The legislation now proceeds to the Senate where the upper chamber will attempt to revise the measure. Again, Senators have opined that they would like to make full expensing and the R&D credit permanent. But given the extremely narrow margin in the House—the bill passed by one vote—it will be interesting to see how the Senate proceeds knowing that significant revisions may disrupt the fragile framework in the lower chamber that enabled this bill to pass. WIA will be working with our Senate champions to encourage permanent extension of these two key business tax benefits. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Federal Forest Management</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">Included in the House Natural Resources Committee’s portion of the budget reconciliation package are provisions that direct both the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management to boost timber harvesting on lands these entities oversee by 25 percent over 2024 levels. </span></span>
    <span
        style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Bruce Westerman (R-AR) is a strong proponent of forest heath and increasing active management of our federal forest landholdings. We will be tracking this provision as the budget reconciliation process moves
        forward. </span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Farm Bill</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">Prospects for reauthorizing the Farm Bill are appearing bleaker by the day. House leaders opted to include certain Farm Bill programs in the House Agriculture Committee’s portion of the budget reconciliation bill. The good news side of this approach is that the bill includes double funding for the Market Access and Foreign Market Development programs. These two funding sources support the American Hardwood Export Council which exists to open up markets overseas for U.S. produced hardwood lumber products. The bad news is that the reconciliation process may only be used for programs that currently receive mandatory funding. Most of the Farm Bill programs that WIA supports are funded with discretionary money and have been omitted from this effort. Further challenging the reauthorization effort is the fact that the budget reconciliation process has left Democrats out of the negotiation—making for strained political relationships at least in the short term.<span>  </span>WIA
    will nevertheless continue to advocate for full funding and renewal of key Farm Bill programs like the Wood Innovation and Community Wood grant programs and the Jobs in the Woods Act—relatively new legislation that was included in the House Agriculture
    Committee-passed Farm Bill reauthorization bill last Congress. </span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Career and Technical Education</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; line-height: 115%; color: #000000;">Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) is circulating a letter among his Senate colleagues urging increased funding for the Perkins state grant program to support CTE in the Fiscal Year 2026 Labor, Health and Human Servies and Education appropriations bills. This effort comes on the heels of a successful letter that was finalized late last month in the House led by Representatives Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-A) and Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR). That bipartisan letter was signed by 78 Members of Congress and sent to the Chair and Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Committee’s Labor, HHS, Education and Related Agencies Subcommittee. </span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 13:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (April 2025) </title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=698714</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=698714</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><strong>Tariffs</strong></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On April 2, President Trump announced a slate of new tariffs to be imposed on countries throughout the world that sell into the U.S. market.&nbsp;The initial announcement imposed a 10 percent tariff on all countries beginning April 5. In addition, individualized “reciprocal” tariffs on</span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"> countries with which the United States has the largest trade deficits would be imposed April 9. <span>&nbsp;</span>In a welcome development</span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"> on the day reciprocal tariffs would take effect, the President announced a pause and reduction of the reciprocal tariffs his administration has levied against more than 75 countries. However, he doubled down against China, raising tariffs to 145 percent, which are now in effect. China immediately announced retaliatory tariffs of 125 percent on U.S. imports. <span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The pause will last 90 days and the tariff rate during that period for targeted countries is 10 percent.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Wood and Wood Energy Grants</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA) reintroduced the Community Wood Facilities Assistance Act in April. The legislation (H.R. 2517), among other things, would double the authorization for the Community Wood grant program from $25 to $50 million annually. This program funds<span>&nbsp; </span>grants for biomass heating and power projects across the country as well as funding for innovative wood product manufacturing facilities. Rep. Gluesenkamp Perez is joined by Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-ME) and Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-WA) as cosponsors. This measure serves as a marker bill for potential inclusion in a Farm Bill reauthorization measure which will hopefully come together later this year. The press release with more details on the legislation can be found <a href="https://gluesenkampperez.house.gov/posts/gluesenkamp-perez-newhouse-pingree-introduce-bipartisan-bill-to-improve-markets-for-forest-products" target="_blank">here.&nbsp;</a></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Jobs in the Woods Act</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">Senators Angus King (I-ME) and Jim Risch (R-ID) have introduced the bipartisan Jobs in the Woods Act (S.1336), which seeks to address workforce challenges in the forestry and forest products manufacturing sector. This legislation directs the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to create a competitive grant program to stand up career pathway training programs in forestry operations, lumber and sawmilling</span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;"> It is modeled after a successful program developed by the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point.</span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;"> Eligible entities encompass nonprofit organizations, state governments, Indian tribes, local government units, and higher education institutions. The USDA is directed to prioritize applicants that focus on tackling workforce aging and youth migration issues, collaborating with secondary schools to engage students, and demonstrating effective workforce placement and hiring strategies in the forest products sector. Senators King and Risch are joined by original cosponsors, including Senators Mike Crapo, Susan Collins, Amy Klobuchar, Jeff Merkley, Jeanne Shaheen, and Tina Smith. Notably, provisions of the Jobs in the Woods Act were incorporated into the House version of the Farm Bill last Congress. A press release on the bill may be found <a href="https://www.king.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/to-boost-forest-workforce-king-introduces-bipartisan-legislation" target="_blank">here.&nbsp;</a></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">The co-chairs of the bipartisan House Career and Technical Education (CTE) Caucus, Reps. Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-PA) and Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), are circulating a “Dear Colleague” letter addressed to the House Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations Subcommittee. The letter requests increased funding for Perkins state grants in the FY 2026 Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education appropriations bill. The letter notes that <i>“</i></span><i><span style="line-height: 115%;">The Perkins Act is the primary source of federal funding for state and local CTE programs. In every Congressional district, CTE programs play a vital role in providing learners and workers pathways that lead to high-wage, high-skill, and in-demand career fields, including sectors of our economy that are currently experiencing critical workforce shortages such as the information technology, healthcare, and the skilled trades fields.”</span></i></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The FY 2026 Congressional appropriations process is in its nascent stages, but WIA will be working with our Congressional champions on securing needed funding for CTE. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Transportation</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA) will soon reintroduce his FRESH Act or Freight Restriction Elimination for Safer Hauling Act of 2025. The bill is a close cousin to the Safe Routes Act and would simply allow trucks hauling “perishable commodities” to access the interstate highway system at weights in excess of 80,000 pounds. Many states allow heavier rigs to travel on their state roads, but these rigs are forbidden from accessing the interstate due to the 80,000-pound maximum gross vehicle weight limit. The term eligible commodity list in the bill includes raw logs and forest products, pulp wood, chips and biomass. The Safe Routes Act (H.R. 2166), sponsored by Rep. Tony Wied (R-WI), takes the same approach but applies only to logging trucks. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Both Collins and Wied are members of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee which will be writing the next highway bill that is up for reauthorization next year. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Tax/Budget Reconciliation</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;"><span style="color: #000000;">Just before leaving Washington for a two-week Easter recess last Thursday, the House approved a compromise budget resolution which begins the process (budget reconciliation) to restore and extend key business tax incentives critical to WIA members. Budget reconciliation is a parliamentary procedure that allows enactment of legislation with a simple majority vote in the Senate instead of the customary 60 vote threshold. A comprehensive budget reconciliation bill will be the vehicle for the Republican majority to revive and extend key business tax benefits that have been phasing out or have outright expired. These benefits include 100 percent bonus depreciation which allows manufacturers to write off the full costs of investments in machinery and equipment in the same year those costs are incurred. This benefit was reduced by 20 percent in 2023, 2024 and again in 2025. It is slated to fully phase out in 2027 unless extended. Also to be included is the Research and Development tax credit which expired in 2022 and restoring more favorable interest deductibility for companies (EBIT to EBITDA). Finally, the bill will extend the Section 199A tax benefit for S-Corporations and other pass-through structures which is scheduled to expire at the end of this year.<span>&nbsp; </span>WIA has been meeting with key lawmakers in both the House and Senate for over a year advocating for restoring and extending these critical benefits.</span> </span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (March 2025)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=696271</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=696271</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Government Funding </span></b></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Last week, the House and Senate passed a 6 month Continuing Resolution (CR) to fund the federal government through the end of the fiscal year. It had appeared earlier in March that we were headed for a federal government shutdown on March 14 when existing funds expired, but House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) was able to hold his slim GOP majority together to pass the measure through the lower chamber. Following that vote, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) signaled he would vote for the CR and it ultimately passed the Senate and was signed by the President. The Fiscal Year 2026 appropriations process will ramp up in Congress in the coming days. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%;">Trade</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">Last Wednesday, the European Union (EU) announced its proposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. products as a result of US tariffs on European steel and aluminum. The European Commission’s statement may be found </span>
    <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_25_750" title="https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_25_750" target="_blank"><span style="line-height: 115%;">here</span></a><span style="line-height: 115%;">. The list of products targeted by the EU is extensive, and includes many wood products like lumber, veneer, molding, flooring, plywood, OSB, casks, and more. These tariffs would go into effect in April, after a consultation period this month. </span></span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">The European Commission (EC) is holding "Stakeholder Consultations," where industry can provide feedback on the proposed tariffs through an </span>
    <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/EU-RL-2025" title="https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/EU-RL-2025" target="_blank"><span style="line-height: 115%;">online survey</span></a><span style="line-height: 115%;">. At this time, US exporters as well as their European importers are encouraged to fill out the online consultation form&nbsp;to encourage the exemption of U.S. forest products from this trade dispute.</span></span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The EC has launched this survey seeking the views of those affected by the tariffs, with a deadline for submissions of March 26th. The full list of products included in this trade action is available on the survey page, and forest products begin with HS code "44". Comments<span></span>on
    these proposals will be accepted until March 26th and we expect the counter-tariffs to go into effect in mid-April. </span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">In earlier trade action March 1, President Trump issued an executive order titled <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/addressing-the-threat-to-national-security-from-imports-of-timber-lumber/" target="_blank">"</a></span>
    <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/addressing-the-threat-to-national-security-from-imports-of-timber-lumber/" target="_blank"><span style="line-height: 115%;">Addressing the Threat to National Security from Imports of Timber, Lumber</span></a><span style="line-height: 115%;"><a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/addressing-the-threat-to-national-security-from-imports-of-timber-lumber/" target="_blank">,</a><a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/addressing-the-threat-to-national-security-from-imports-of-timber-lumber/" target="_blank">"</a> which initiates a Section 232 investigation under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. This investigation aims to determine whether imports of timber, lumber, and derivative products, such as paper and furniture, pose a threat to U.S. national security.
        The order emphasizes vulnerabilities in the domestic wood supply chain and seeks to address them through potential measures like tariffs, export controls, or incentives to enhance domestic production. It highlights the vital role of the wood products
        industry in supporting national defense, economic stability, and industrial resilience.</span>
        </span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The Department of Commerce leads on all 232 investigations and Commerce’s report, including recommendations to mitigate threats and strengthen the industry, is due no later than November 26th. Among the factors to be examined in the investigation are:&nbsp;</span></p>
<ul style="list-style-type: square;">
    <li style="color: #313131; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">the current and projected demand for timber and lumber in the United States;</span></span>
    </li>
    <li style="color: #313131; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">the extent to which domestic production of timber and lumber can meet domestic demand;</span></span>
    </li>
    <li style="color: #313131; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">the role of foreign supply chains, particularly of major exporters, in meeting United States timber and lumber demand;</span></span>
    </li>
    <li style="color: #313131; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">the impact of foreign government subsidies and predatory trade practices on United States timber, lumber, and derivative product industry competitiveness;</span></span>
    </li>
    <li style="color: #313131; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">the feasibility of increasing domestic timber and lumber capacity to reduce imports; and</span></span>
    </li>
    <li style="color: #313131; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">the impact of current trade policies on domestic timber, lumber, and derivative product production, and whether additional measures, including tariffs or quotas, are necessary to protect national security.</span></span>
    </li>
</ul>
<p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Initiation of the 232 investigation does not necessarily predicate additional tariff action, but engagement from the entire forest products supply chain will be critical. We will keep you posted on opportunities to comment. </span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In other trade news, the President announced earlier this month that the 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico that kicked in on March 4 would be paused until April 2—coincidentally the same day that the reciprocal tariffs will take effect, according to the President. Regarding the latter, these tariffs would be imposed on trading partners at a rate equivalent to the duty assessed on U.S. goods entering those markets. Clearly the situation on the trade front is fluid and we will do our best to report on developments as they happen. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Tax</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On March 10, Representatives Ron Estes (R-KS) and John Larson (D-CT) reintroduced the American Innovation and R&amp;D Competitiveness Act. The bill, which boasts 64 original cosponsors, would permanently allow for companies to fully expense their research and development (R&amp;D) costs in the year in which those costs are incurred. Recall that this benefit expired in 2022, forcing companies to amortize these costs over a 5-year period. The bill revives the so-called R&amp;D tax credit retroactively to 2022 and will be a centerpiece of discussion as the budget reconciliation tax package is forged in the weeks and months ahead. <span></span></span>
    <span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span></span></span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">EPA</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Last week, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin announced a number of regulatory reform initiatives aimed at relieving compliance burdens on the regulated community. Of the 31 deregulatory actions that were announced, WIA is paying particular attention to plans to revisit the particulate matter (PM) 2.5 standard that was tightened last year. Recall, that the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for PM was ratcheted down from 12 micrograms per cubic meter (<span style="background: white;">µg/m³) </span>to
    9 <span style="background: white;">µg/m³. This action threatened to bring large swaths of the country into nonattainment for the pollutant, resulting in barriers to obtaining new permits to expand operations, for example. </span></span>
</p>
<p><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On the same day, Administrator Zeldin announced that EPA will work with the Army Corps of Engineers to review the definition of “waters of the United States” or WOTUS. The action aims at revising the definition in a way that provides farmers, forest landowners, businesses and states with clear and simplified direction for compliance. WOTUS has been litigated and debated for years and has led to expanded interpretation on what types of waters are under federal Clean Water Act jurisdiction—forcing landowners to obtain federal permits for wet areas on or near their land that could be interpreted to be a so-called “jurisdictional waters”—meaning they are covered by Clean Water Act protections and thus subject to discharge permits. <span></span></span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Jobs in the Woods Act/Workforce Development</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Congresswoman Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA-3) is set to reintroduce the Jobs in the Woods Act in the coming weeks. She previously introduced this legislation during the 118th Congress alongside former Representative Lori Chavez-DeRemer, who is now the Secretary of the Department of Labor. The Jobs in the Woods Act requires the Department of Agriculture (USDA) to award competitive grants to eligible entities to conduct career pathway training programs in forestry, logging and sawmilling operations. We will keep you posted on developments and recruitment of a Republican co-lead in the House. &nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">In the broader workforce development space, </span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">the House Small Business Committee reported seven bills last week, one of which was H.R. 1642, the </span><i><span style="line-height: 115%;">“Connecting Small Businesses with Career and Technical Education Graduates Act of 2025.”</span></i>
    <span style="line-height: 115%;">&nbsp;– introduced by Committee Chairman Rep. Roger Williams (R-TX). The committee approved the bill unanimously 28-0.<span>&nbsp; </span></span>
    </span>
</p>
<p style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The legislation amends the Small Business Act to add a requirement for Small Business Development Centers (SBDCs) and Women’s Business Centers (WBCs) to educate small businesses on identifying career opportunities for graduates of career and technical education programs. It also requires SBDCs and WBCs to assist graduates of such programs who want to start a small business of their own. WIA will continue to support and monitor this bill as it progresses.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Federal Forst Lands/Timber Production </span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">On March 1, President Trump issued an Executive Order the </span><a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/immediate-expansion-of-american-timber-production/" target="_blank"><span style="line-height: 115%;">"Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production</span></a>
    <span style="line-height: 115%;">" aimed at boosting domestic timber production while addressing forest health, wildfire mitigation, and economic benefits. Key directives include:</span>
    </span>
</p>
<ul style="list-style-type: disc;">
    <li style="text-align: left; line-height: 107%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 107%;">Updated Guidance</span></b><span style="line-height: 107%;">: Within 30 days, the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture must issue revised guidance to enhance timber production and forest management.</span></span>
    </li>
    <li style="text-align: left; line-height: 107%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 107%;">Streamlined Approvals</span></b><span style="line-height: 107%;">: A strategy to expedite forest management project approvals under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) is to be developed within 60 days.</span></span>
    </li>
    <li style="text-align: left; line-height: 107%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 107%;">Timber Sales Targets</span></b><span style="line-height: 107%;">: A four-year plan setting annual timber sale goals for federal lands is due within 90 days.</span></span>
    </li>
    <li style="text-align: left; line-height: 107%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 107%;">NEPA Categorical Exclusions</span></b><span style="line-height: 107%;">: Within 180 days, the administration will explore using categorical exclusions under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to accelerate timber production approvals.</span></span>
    </li>
    <li style="text-align: left; line-height: 107%;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 107%;">Wildfire Mitigation</span></b><span style="line-height: 107%;">: Improved forest management practices aim to reduce wildfire risks and enhance ecosystem health.</span></span>
    </li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The order emphasizes the importance of sustainable forest management to mitigate wildfire risk and increase timber production and improve the efficiency of ESA consultations between federal agencies which often delay forest management actions.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">In more federal forest policy news, last Thursday, the Senate Agriculture Subcommittee held a hearing to take testimony on the Fix Our Forests Act (</span>
    <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/471/text" target="_blank"><span style="line-height: 115%;">H.R. 471</span></a><span style="line-height: 115%;">), which passed the House on a bipartisan vote in January. The legislation is a comprehensive bill <span></span>that aims to&nbsp;restore forest health, increase resiliency
        to wildfires, and protect communities. It does so by expediting federal environmental analyses on proposed forest management plans, reducing frivolous lawsuits and increasing the pace and scale of forest restoration projects.</span>
        </span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Container Ship Fees</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On February 21, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) announced it would propose fees on Chinese ships and operators calling on U.S. ports in response to China’s growing maritime influence, which the Administration deems to be an unreasonable risk to U.S. commerce. The fees, which could be up to $1.5 million, are causing major concern up and down the manufacturing and retailing supply chain.<span>&nbsp; </span></span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The proposal follows a trade investigation into China’s practices in the maritime, logistics and shipbuilding industries that began under the Biden administration and concluded with a report just four days before the President took office. The inquiry concluded that Beijing was unfairly dominating the sectors and said “urgent action” was needed to address the issue.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Specifically, the measures include port entrance fees of up to $1 million per ship owned by a Chinese vessel operator or up to $1,000 per net ton of a vessel’s capacity. For international maritime transport operators whose fleets are comprised solely of Chinese ships, the port entrance fee would amount to $1.5 million, according to USTR. For operators with fleets comprised of 50 percent or more Chinese-built vessels, the charge will be up to $1 million per vessel entrance to a US port. The fee would be reduced if the percentage is below 50.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Corporate Transparency Act</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In a welcome development, the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) announced that it is ceasing enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) while it crafts a new set of regulations that will ultimately narrow the scope of the reporting regime. The CTA’s reporting requirements were scheduled to take effect once again beginning March 21.</span></p>
<p class="indent-1"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><i>FinCEN announced that it will not issue any fines or penalties or take any other enforcement actions against any companies based on any failure to file or update beneficial ownership information (BOI) reports pursuant to the Corporate Transparency Act by the current deadlines. <u>No fines or penalties will be issued, and no enforcement actions will be taken, until a forthcoming interim final rule becomes effective and the new relevant due dates in the interim final rule have passed.</u> This announcement continues Treasury’s commitment to reducing regulatory burden on businesses, as well as prioritizing under the Corporate Transparency Act reporting of BOI for those entities that pose the most significant law enforcement and national security risks. [Emphasis added.]</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">FinCen also made clear that a new proposed rule will be unveiled next month and will likely include significant changes to the existing reporting regime:</span></p>
<p class="indent-1"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><i>No later than March 21, 2025, FinCEN intends to issue an interim final rule that extends BOI reporting deadlines, recognizing the need to provide new guidance and clarity as quickly as possible, while ensuring that BOI that is highly useful to important national security, intelligence, and law enforcement activities is reported.</i></span></p>
<p class="indent-1"><i><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">FinCEN also intends to solicit public comment on potential revisions to existing BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN will consider those comments as part of a notice of proposed rulemaking anticipated to be issued later this year to minimize burden on small businesses while ensuring that BOI is highly useful to important national security, intelligence, and law enforcement activities, as well to determine what, if any, modifications to the deadlines referenced here should be considered.</span></i></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (February 2025)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=693977</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=693977</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Trade</strong><br /><br />The pace of action on international trade since President Trump took office less than a month ago has been frenetic. Last Thursday, the President announced that the Administration, through the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), Department of Commerce and other agencies, would move forward with reciprocal tariffs on a country-by-country basis, avoiding what he characterized as a “one-size-fits-all” approach to trade arrangements. The anticipated action will follow submission of agency reports, analyzing the extent of trade imbalances between the U.S. and specific trading partners according to Administration officials. After submission of the reports, which are due April 1, the White House directive orders federal agencies to “initiate … all necessary actions to investigate the harm to the U.S. from any non-reciprocal trade arrangements adopted by the trading partners.” <br /> <br />Reciprocal tariffs usually refer to measures taken by both parties to ensure fairness in bilateral commerce. The goal is to offset not just a trading partner’s own tariffs on US goods, but also other factors deemed to put American manufacturers at a disadvantage, such as subsidies to businesses that are seen as unfair, regulations, value-added taxes (VATs), exchange rates and lax intellectual property protections. These so-called “non-tariff barriers” can be hard to quantify.<br /><br />Reciprocal tariffs could be imposed in a number of ways: They could be applied to specific products, to entire industries, or as an average tariff on goods arriving from a specific country. In the coming days and weeks, we may see additional details about how the administration plans to implement this plan. There are a number of existing avenues to pursue, including through Section 338 of the Trade Act and an investigation by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) to determine if discriminatory action has occurred. According to Section 338 of the Trade Act, an ITC investigation could view “discrimination” in a variety of relatively broad ways, including a country directly or indirectly placing the commerce of the United States at a disadvantage compared with the commerce of any foreign country. That could be through regulations, practices by or in respect to any customs, tonnage, or port duty fee, charge, exaction, classification, restriction, or prohibition on products.  <br /><br /> This action is the latest in a series of developments on trade. The following is a brief recap--<br /> <br /><strong>Aluminum and Steel Tariffs:</strong> On February 10, the Administration announced it would impose a 25 percent tariff on global steel and aluminum imports, which will go into effect at 12:01 a.m. on March 12.<br /> <br /><strong>Canada and Mexico:</strong>  Even though Canada and Mexico are subject to the product-specific tariffs on steel and aluminum, imposition of broader 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico continue to be on hold until March 1. Both countries have promised retaliatory action should tariffs move forward.  Canada’s retaliatory list includes a 25 percent tariff on wood and products from the U.S.<br /> <br /><strong>China:</strong> 10 percent tariffs on Chinese imports to the U.S. went into effect on February 1, prompting retaliatory tariffs on a limited set of products from China, which kicked in February 10. So far, an expected conversation between President Trump and Chinese President Xi to has not yet taken place.<br /><br />WIA is close to the action and will keep you apprised as more details become available.</span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><strong><span style="line-height: 115%;">Corporate Transparency Act</span></strong><span style="line-height: 115%;"><br /> Early last week, legislation to extend the deadline for an estimated 32 million small businesses to report their beneficial ownership information (BOI) as mandated by the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) passed the U.S. House unanimously.<br /> <br /> The House passed&nbsp;</span>
    <a href="https://forestresources.us10.list-manage.com/track/click?u=fe05627ee296370dad39e8d7e&amp;id=43c687958e&amp;e=383cc0a5fd" target="_blank"><span style="line-height: 115%;">H.R. 736,&nbsp;</span></a><a href="https://forestresources.us10.list-manage.com/track/click?u=fe05627ee296370dad39e8d7e&amp;id=ec4d99b891&amp;e=383cc0a5fd" target="_blank"><em><span style="line-height: 115%;">Protect Small Businesses From Excessive Paperwork Act of 2025</span></em></a>
    <span style="line-height: 115%;">, 408–0. The bill, which proceeds to the Senate next, extends the deadline for filing BOI reports to January 1, 2026. The deadline for most reports previously was January 1, 2025, but the reporting requirements have been
                                    caught up in numerous court cases and are now on hold.<br /> <br /> Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott (R-SC) introduced a companion bill in the Senate on Tuesday. Both bills only affect reporting companies
                                    that existed before January 1, 2024. Companies formed after that date are not affected.<br /> </span>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Workforce </span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Next week, Senators Jim Risch (R-ID) and Angus King (I-ME) are expected to reintroduce the Jobs in the Woods Act—legislation that authorizes grants to stand up training programs to attract workers into the forestry, logging and forest products manufacturing sectors. The bill is modeled after a highly successful training program developed at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point that features a mobile sawmill that travels to local and community colleges to allow students to obtain hands-on experience. </span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Provisions of the legislation were folded into the House Agriculture Committee-passed Farm Bill legislation last year which stalled before it received a House floor vote. We anticipate that the Jobs in the Woods Act legislation will ride on Farm Bill reauthorizing legislation in the 119<sup>th</sup> Congress. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Tax</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">A considerable amount of activity is happening in the tax space. On the macro level, House and Senate leaders have started the budget reconciliation process which will enable them to pass GOP policy priorities through the Senate with only a simple majority vote instead of the usual 60 vote threshold. </span>
    <span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On Thursday, the House Budget Committee approved a comprehensive budget resolution by a 21-16 party-line vote. Committee approval of the resolution—the first step in moving a budget reconciliation package— provides significant
                                momentum in the House Republican leadership’s effort to enact President Trump’s domestic policy priorities in a single bill. The measure would extend key business tax benefits of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (including 100
                                percent bonus depreciation and the research and development tax credit), as well as appropriate funds for border security and provisions that advance energy exploration and development policies. In the Senate, Republican
                                leadership continues to pursue a two-bill approach, with the Senate Budget Committee acting last week to move a budget resolution that addresses border security and energy. Senate leaders—who may pursue Senate passage of
                                this proposal this week--would prefer to address these issues in the first package and follow-up with a second bill dedicated solely to tax. The concern among House leaders with the 2-bill approach is that the second bill
                                may never materialize. House Speaker Johnson&nbsp;is trying to manage several competing factions in his own party which currently only holds a one seat majority in the House. His current thinking is that he will only be able
                                to hold his fragile caucus together for a vote on a single, comprehensive measure. <br /> <br /> The House is in recess this week for the Presidents Day holiday but will be back in the capital the following week, during
                                which it is expected to consider the House Budget Committee-passed resolution.&nbsp;<br /> </span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><br /> </span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In other tax news, <span style="background: white;">Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) last week led 45 of his Senate colleagues, including Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, in reintroducing legislation that would permanently repeal the federal estate tax, commonly known as the death tax.&nbsp;Thune, who has long made estate tax repeal a priority, led the Senate’s attempt to repeal the estate tax while Congress considered the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) in 2017. Although the final version of the TCJA did not repeal the estate tax, the law effectively doubled the individual estate and gift tax exclusion to $10 million (approximately $13.9 million in 2025 dollars) through 2025, which prevents more families and generationally-owned businesses from being affected by this tax. The increased exclusion expires at the end of 2025, which increases uncertainty and planning costs for family-owned businesses. &nbsp;</span></span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">And finally, earlier in January </span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">legislation making the Section 199A deduction for S-Corporations and other pass-through tax structures permanent was reintroduced. Recall this 20 percent deduction expires at the end of 2025. Known as the Main Street Tax Certainty Act, the legislation is identical to bills introduced in the House and Senate last Congress led by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) and Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-PA-11). The legislation boasts 152 cosponsors in the House and 33 cosponsors in the Senate. The effort is bicameral and bipartisan, which bodes well for its inclusion in a tax reconciliation bill that will be assembled in the coming weeks (see above).<br /> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Regulatory Reform Legislation </span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p class="keep" style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On February 12, the House approved legislation (H.R. 77) to dramatically expand Congress’s ability to roll back regulations approved by the prior administration. Currently, Congress may pass a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution that overturns on a case-by-case basis regulations<span>&nbsp; </span>adopted
    in roughly the last 6 months of the previous President’s term. H.R. 77 would expand on this authority to apply to those regulations adopted during the previous year of a President’s final year in office and allow Congress to bundle many rules together
    and overturn them in a single vote. </span>
</p>
<p class="keep" style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The final vote was 212-208. Reps. Henry Cuellar (D-TX) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) were the only Democrats to support the measure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Nominations</span></b>
    </span>
</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In a bipartisan vote last Thursday, the Senate voted 72-28 to confirm Brooke Rollins to serve as US Department of Agriculture Secretary. This is a key cabinet position as her Department oversees and administers Wood Innovation Grants as well as the Community Wood grant program—both support mass timber/cross laminated timber projects across the country. USDA also administers a suite of renewable energy programs that promote biomass heat and power projects at sawmills and other forest products manufacturing facilities. Moreover, USDA houses the Forest Service that is responsible for managing our federal forest lands and the Forest Inventory and Analysis program which keeps tabs on the health of the U.S. forest resource. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Up next week in committee is former Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer to become the next Secretary of Labor. Chavez-DeRemer is a moderate Republican who was eager to reach across the aisle during her time in Congress and work with like-minded Democrats on policy issues. She was the lead Republican in the House on the Jobs in the Woods Act legislation and was a member of the House Problem Solvers Caucus. Several Republican Senators are expected to vote “no” on her nomination due to her support for pro-labor union legislation known as the PRO Act, however she will pick up Democrat support and is expected to be confirmed. </span></p>
<p style="line-height: 110%;">&nbsp;</p>
<div>&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (January 2025)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=691637</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=691637</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Trade</span></b></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The situation regarding imposition of tariffs on our trading partners remains fluid. Shortly after President Trump was sworn into office on Monday, his Administration announced that it would “study” potential tariffs on China, Canada and Mexico. Later that evening in an interview, the President indicated that he would seek 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico beginning February 1. In preparation, Canadian government officials have been meeting with House and Senate leaders announcing the Canadian government’s intention to impose retaliatory tariffs aimed at products made in states that form the base of President Trump’s support should tariffs on Canadian imports be imposed. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Meanwhile, U.S. companies whose supply chains rely on parts from both countries are also sounding the alarm with elected officials here in D.C. WIA is on hand and following developments closely.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Federal Forest Management/Wildfires</span></b></span></p> <p style="line-height: 125%;"><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Congressman Bruce Westerman (R-AR) and Representative Scott Peters (D-CA) reintroduced the Fix Our Forests Act late last week. The swift reintroduction in the 119th Congress underscores the urgent need to enhance forest management projects to mitigate wildfire risks. The full House is scheduled to take up the legislation Wednesday, in part as a response to the California wildfires.&nbsp;We expect a Senate version of the bill to be introduced in the coming weeks. The House passed the Fix Our Forests Act in September 2024 with bipartisan support. </span></p> <p style="line-height: 125%;"><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Among other things, the bill would: <span>&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;<br /> </span></p> <ul style="list-style-type: square;"><li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Simplify and expedite environmental reviews for forest management projects.</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Make communities more resilient to wildfires by better coordinating existing grant programs and promoting new research.</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Promote federal, state, tribal and local collaboration.</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Deter frivolous litigation that delays essential projects.</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Create a framework for prioritizing treatments in the forests at the highest risk of wildfire and near vulnerable communities.</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Encourage the adoption of state-of-the-art science and techniques for federal land managers.</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Encourage active management to improve the safety of powerlines and other infrastructure.</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Strengthen existing policy tools like Good Neighbor Authority and Stewardship Contracting.</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 125%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Support wildland firefighters and their families by ensuring continuity in casualty assistance programs.</span></li></ul><p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"> <em>"As tragic wildfires rage in Los Angeles, we're working in Washington to help prevent these types of catastrophes in the future with the Fix Our Forests Act. It's time to take an all-hands-on-deck approach and use proven science to restore our forests to a healthy state and protect communities in the wildland-urban interface from wildfires. This legislation will leave our nation's forests more resilient and ensure they can be responsibly enjoyed and managed for generations to come."</em><strong> - House Committee on Natural Resources Chairman Bruce Westerman (R-AR-04), who is himself a forester.</strong><br /> </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Tax</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Republican leaders announced last week that a budget resolution would be ready for consideration in early February. This is important as passage of a budget resolution kicks off the budget reconciliation parliamentary process that GOP leadership intends to use to extend or make permanent the business tax benefits enacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Included in the resolution will be “instructions” to the relevant Congressional policy committees to assemble legislation <span style="background: white;">to change spending, revenues, deficits or the debt limit by specific amounts. Each committee<span>&nbsp; </span>then compiles legislation to achieve its target, and if more than one committee is told to act, the Budget Committee bundles each measure into one large bill.</span></span></p> <p><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The current timeline has the House acting on the resolution in early February with the Senate following suit mid-month. Speaker Johnson’s goal is to have budget reconciliation legislation ready in April with final passage complete by Memorial Day. This timeline may be optimistic, however. </span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Recall that the TCJA was enacted at the very end of President Trump’s second year in office, so these efforts are complicated and take time to mature. The other issue under discussion is whether there will be two reconciliation packages or just one. Senate leadership has been advocating for a first reconciliation bill to address border security, energy production and military readiness, with a second follow-on package dealing solely with tax. The situation is fluid.</span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Items to be included in a tax reconciliation bill are extension of the 100 percent bonus depreciation tax benefit, extension of the research and development tax credit and renewing the 20 percent deduction for S-Corporations and pass through entities.<span>&nbsp; </span>Regarding the latter, WIA signed onto a letter last week in support of legislation that is going to be introduced by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) and Representative Lloyd Smucker (R-PA) known as the Main Street Tax Certainty Act of 2025. This bill would make permanent the Section 199A deduction for pass throughs. <a href="https://s-corp.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/199A-Trades-Letter-Main-Street-Tax-Certainty-Act-2025-1-22-25.pdf" target="_blank">You can read the letter here</a>.</span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">The WIA team will be actively engaged in the process moving forward over the next several weeks and will keep you regularly informed of developments.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">On January 15, R<span style="background: white;">epresentative Warren Davidson (R-OH) and Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) reintroduced their bicameral CTA repeal bill, dubbed the&nbsp;<em>Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act</em>. The legislation is only 3 pages and was introduced with 68 cosponsors in the House.</span></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">As we have noted, the CTA reporting obligations took effect last year, but a nationwide court injunction was put in place late last year and implementation of the law is on hold until the Supreme Court rules on the matter. A one-year delay in the compliance deadline was part of the initial Continuing Resolution to fund the government in December but fell out of the final package that was signed into law. We will keep you apprised of the action on this important issue.</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 19:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (December 2024)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=689394</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=689394</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">The Last Gasp of the 118<sup>th</sup> Congress—Farm Bill and Workforce Development </span></span></b></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Congress is racing to tie up some critical loose ends this week before gaveling out the 118<sup>th</sup> Congress and leaving town for the rest of the year. Primary among them is funding the federal government. House and Senate negotiators finally forged a deal late Tuesday on a<span>&nbsp; </span>Continuing Resolution (CR) to extend federal government operations into mid-March of next year. Also included in the 1, 547-page measure is at least one key WIA policy deliverable and a couple of other notable policy provisions. They are:</span></p> <ul style="list-style-type: square;"><li><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Reauthorization of WIOA</span></b><span style="line-height: 115%;">—the CR includes provisions of the Stronger Workforce for America Act (H.R. 6655), which updates the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA). This comprehensive statute underpins all our country’s workforce development programs and has not been reauthorized since 2014. Among other things, the bill would—</span></span></li></ul> <ul style="list-style-type: square;"> <ul style="list-style-type: circle;"> <li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Dedicate 50 percent of the adult and dislocated worker funding toward upskilling workers through “individual training accounts” (ITAs), on-the-job learning, and wrap-around supports, while redirecting an existing funding stream toward ITAs for displaced workers.&nbsp;</span></li> <li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Prioritize employer-led initiatives that equip workers with the skill sets to fill jobs in critical industries and help the currently employed workforce upskill to avoid displacement and advance their careers.</span></li> <li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Streamline the “eligible training provider list” to focus on outcomes and ensure eligible programs are aligned with the skill and hiring demands of employers.&nbsp;</span></li> <li style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Strengthen and fully implement the performance accountability system in the law to hold states and local workforce boards accountable for achieving positive labor market outcomes for program participants.</span></li> </ul> </ul>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Working to reauthorize WIOA has been a WIA policy priority for the last couple of years. The other two items that are notable are—</span></p><ul style="list-style-type: square;"><li><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">A one-year extension of the Farm Bill. This action was essential as the House and Senate could not come together this year on a broader 5-year reauthorization measure. As part of this extension, farmers and forest landowners will receive significant funding for relief from natural disasters and wildfire. But this action buys time for new leadership in the 119<sup>th</sup> Congress to forge consensus on a broader 5-year bill. </span></li><li><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">A one-year delay in implementation of reporting requirements under the Corporate Transparency Act. The CTA took effect at the beginning of 2024 and Beneficial Ownership Information reports for companies formed prior to January 1, 2024 are due January 1, 2025. If the CR is enacted in its current form, this deadline would be pushed back one year. The CTA is an anti-money laundering statute that requires small businesses with less than $5 million in revenue and fewer than 20 employees to file reports on their ownership. Fines for not filing total almost $600 per day and noncompliance could result in a prison sentence. </span></li></ul><p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA)’s whip team is working the phones today to find enough votes to pass this measure on Friday. Elements of this package may be altered or eliminated as this process unfolds. We will keep you apprised of developments. </span></p><p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">House Leadership Developments</span></b></span></p><p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Last week the House Republican Steering Committee selected Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-KY) over Rep. Bob Latta (R-OH) to be the next Chairman of the influential House Energy and Commerce Committee. This panel leads on most environmental issues related to air, water and waste, as well as energy supply and efficiency policy. We have worked closely with Mr. Guthrie and his team since he took office in 2008. He is a solid, pragmatic legislator that is well liked by his peers and those in the government affairs realm. This committee will be active next year in considering Congressional Review Act resolutions to overturn some of the Biden Administration’s rules and regulations in the environmental policy space, among other areas. One rule in particular that may be an area of focus is the particulate matter 2.5 standard. EPA opted to tighten the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) from the existing 12 parts per cubic meter down to 9 <span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; letter-spacing: 0.1pt;">(μg/m3) which is considered background level for the pollutant. PM 2.5 is essentially fine dust that is produced by engine exhaust or virtually any activity that causes fine particles to become airborne—construction, manufacturing, logging and vehicle traffic, among others. Tightening the standard to 9 brought enormous swaths of the country into nonattainment for the pollutant, which makes obtaining a permit to expand a facility and grow a business in these areas much more difficult. </span></span></p><p><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; letter-spacing: 0.1pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Also last week, the Steering Committee gave Rep. Tim Wahlberg (R-MI) the nod to head the House Education and Workforce Committee next year. Walberg prevailed over Rep. Burgess Owens (R-UT) for the top spot on this key panel. In his social media posts after receiving the news, incoming Chairman Walberg emphasized that addressing the workforce challenges of U.S. employers will be one of his key objectives. </span></p><p><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; letter-spacing: 0.1pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">In other committee leadership news, Rep. Rick Crawford (R-AR) dropped out of the race to Chair the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee next Congress. He had initiated a challenge to current Chairman Sam Graves (R-MO), who was term limited in that role but was pursuing a waiver from the rule. Once the Republican Steering Committee granted the waiver, Crawford opted to end his bid. The T&amp;I Committee leads on policy issues associated with trucking—importantly the issue of truck weight reform to make truck transportation more efficient and cost effective.<span>&nbsp; </span><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></span></p><p><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; letter-spacing: 0.1pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">On the Democrat side, two moderate lawmakers on the House Agriculture Committee challenged current Chairman David Scott (D-GA) for the Ranking Member position on committee next Congress. Scott is 79 and there has been a whisper campaign for several months among his colleagues about whether he can meet the challenge of negotiating a Farm Bill reauthorization. Representatives Jim Costa (D-CA) and Angie Craig (D-MN) stepped forward and it was announced on December 16 that Rep. Craig would fill the top Democrat seat on the panel next year.<span>&nbsp; </span></span></p><p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">The other important committee leadership race is for Ranking Member of the House Natural Resources Committee. Current Ranking Member Raul Grijalva (D-AZ) decided to step down from his post after Rep. Jared Huffman (D-CA) announced he was running against him. Shortly thereafter, Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-NM) announced that she was also running for the top Democrat slot on the panel. This committee leads on all issues associated with forestry and forest management, including timber harvesting on federal lands. The Democrat Steering and Policy Committee announced earlier this week that Rep. Huffman would be the new Ranking Member next year. </span></p><p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Looking ahead to 2025, a new Administration and the 119<sup>th</sup> Congress</span></b></span></p><p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">As expected, the Congressional calendars for the 119<sup>th</sup> Congress came out the first week of December and based on the number of days that Congress has penciled in to be in Washington, 2025 is looking to be a very busy year. The typical cadence for Members of Congress is to parachute into D.C. late Monday or early Tuesday. Starting Tuesday, they attend committee hearings and markups, fundraise, cast votes and then, when the lure of jet fumes becomes too much to bear, call it a wrap on Thursday and head back home Thursday afternoon. According to the new calendars, which will not be the case next year. There will be a<span>&nbsp; </span>number of Fridays where both Houses are in session and incoming Senate Majority Leader Thune has been telling his colleagues to prepare for weekend work as well. We shall see, but the incoming leadership has identified a number of consequential, challenging policy issues to address—some of which are discussed below—and maximizing their time in Washington will be essential to make meaningful progress on any of them. </span></p><p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Tax</span></b></span></p><p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">As we have noted many times over the course of this year, 2025 is shaping up to be historic in the tax space. Tax lobbyists that we attend meetings with are dubbing 2025 as the “Super Bowl of Tax” and “Taxmageddon.” While we anticipated that tackling expired and expiring business tax benefits would be the first item out of the gate next year as part of a budget reconciliation package, it appears that President-elect Trump and Republican leadership are going to first pursue some of the other issues on which he campaigned. Incoming Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) announced in early December that he would like to see the outlines of a budget reconciliation bill within the first 30 days after President-elect Trump takes office. According to leadership staff we have spoken to, the GOP will pursue two distinct reconciliation packages next year. The first will focus on energy, border security and military readiness/defense. Specifics on policies that will fall into these tranches are not yet clear. The second package will focus singularly on tax and extending the business tax benefits enacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). </span></p><p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">The appeal of using the budget reconciliation process is that it circumnavigates the 60-vote threshold in the Senate--meaning that only a simple majority is needed to clear the upper chamber. As Republicans will hold 53 Senate seats in the 119<sup>th</sup> Congress, these measures are certain to pass barring any GOP defections. Reconciliation has fairly strict parameters but has been used often in situations where one party controls both chambers of Congress and the White House. </span></p><p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">The Wood Industry Association’s priorities in the second reconciliation bill will be restoring the full expensing tax benefit that has been phasing out over the last few years and is scheduled to take another 20 percent haircut in January. The plan is to restore 100 percent bonus depreciation back to 100 percent and do so retroactively. The other piece is reviving and extending the research and development (R&amp;D) tax credit. As part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the ability of businesses to fully expense R&amp;D costs in the same year those costs were incurred expired in 2022. Currently, those R&amp;D costs have to be amortized over a 5-year period—essentially making investments in your business more expensive. Again, the plan is to restore and extend full expensing of R&amp;D costs and make restoration of this key tax benefit retroactive. Also riding on this second train will be extending the 20 percent tax deduction for S-Corporations and other pass-through tax structures. This benefit was also put in place by the TCJA in an effort to introduce some semblance of tax parity between the rate larger C corporations negotiated and that which is assessed to smaller Main Street businesses. Unfortunately, this benefit expires at the end of 2025 and its extension is critical. To provide perspective, 62 percent of all private sector jobs are anchored by pass-through businesses. To put a finer point on it, 88 million people in this country show up for work every day at a business that is structured as a pass-through. It is a tax structure that is popular in our sector and WIA will be working with our allies in the business community and Congress next year to ensure that this deduction is carried forward. </span></p><p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Farm Bill</span></b></span></p><p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">As mentioned above, the politics simply did not align between Democrats and Republicans this year on a Farm Bill rewrite. Party leadership remained so far apart on spending priorities that forging consensus was unachievable. We remain hopeful that new leadership—potentially on both the Agriculture Committees—will yield different results in the new Congress. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) will be new in the Ranking Member slot on the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee. She and incoming Chairman John Boozman (R-AR) have a good working relationship and both have proven to be champions on key issues to the forestry and forest products sectors. In the House, Chairman GT Thompson (R-PA) will continue on as Chairman, but there may be a new Ranking Member (discussed above). This issue will be settled before Congress leaves for the year. </span></p><p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">While a new Farm Bill was not enacted in 2024, it was not an “all for naught” exercise. Many provisions that surfaced in the House and Senate Farm Bill proposals were positive, including legislative fully supporting grant programs at the Department of Agriculture that incentivize innovative wood product manufacturing like mass timber/CLT. The House Agriculture Committee passed bill also includes forestry and forest products workforce development provisions that will help enhance the supply of trained employees that can work in wood machinery manufacturing facilities and sawmills. WIA looks to build on this progress in 2025 and we remain optimistic that a new Farm Bill will be signed into law sometime next year.<span>&nbsp; </span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Trade</span></b></span></p><p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">The President-elect’s campaign rhetoric over the last year or so has been pretty consistent on the international trade front. He has vowed that from Day One of his second Presidency he plans to get tough with our trading partners and rely heavily on his favorite tool to level the international playing field—tariffs. It is difficult to ascertain at this point whether the President-elect is using the threat of tariffs simply to bring our trading partners to the negotiating table or if he really is preparing to impose tariffs on China, Mexico, Canada and European Union countries in January. WIA is keeping a close eye on developments in this space as trade has been a top tier issue for us in the past. </span></p><p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">There will of course be many other policy issues that surface next year, but these three are top of mind for WIA and the ones for which we are preparing. The new Congress-the 119<sup>th</sup>-will gavel in January 3 when newly elected Members are sworn in and then the action starts. As always, the WIA team is here and engaged and will be communicating developments regularly as the Congressional and new Administration’s agenda takes shape.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR)</span></b></span></p><p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">The first week of December, </span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">the European Union tentatively agreed to delay the implementation of the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) for large businesses until December 30, 2025, and for smaller businesses (up to 250 employees) until June 30, 2026. The provisional agreement required endorsement by the EU Council and the EU Parliament, which occurred on <span></span>December 17. The proposed amendment to add a "no risk" category to the EUDR was not approved. This issue has been a major concern for solid wood producers—and really every link in the forest products value chain—as the EUDR’s requirement that all fiber entering the EU marketplace be traced back to the exact parcel where it was harvested.<span>&nbsp; </span>While no entity can satisfy this requirement, the one-year delay is at least some positive news and buys time for resolution of the issue.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><br />]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (November 2024)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=686735</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=686735</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">Election 2024</span></b></p><p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Public opinion polling on the state of the Presidential race over the last few months consistently showed that November 5 promised to be a nail biter. In fact, commentators and political experts were forecasting that we would not see final Presidential results until days after the election. In discussions we had before election day, it was noted that in these close contests, the results often break hard in one candidate’s direction. That turned out to be true on election night. It was pretty clear early in the evening that the Trump/Vance ticket was going to hold swing states that were on the margin (Georgia and North Carolina) and prevail in key battlegrounds like Pennsylvania. Michigan and Wisconsin were called for Trump the next day. In fact, the President-elect swept all the swing states and currently has 312 Electoral votes—needing only 270—and won the popular vote. He will be sworn in January 20. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">As expected, the GOP regained control of the U.S. Senate with 53 seats in the 100-seat chamber, picking up seats in West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Montana. Two other close races in Nevada and Arizona were called for Democrats giving them 47 seats. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">For the first time in 17 years, Senate Republicans have selected a new leader. As you know, Mitch McConnell stepped aside and the race for the top leadership spot was between Senators John Thune (R-SD) and John Cornyn (R-TX) to be his successor. Senator Rick Scott (R-FL) was also in the running, but his bid was seen as a long shot. In a secret ballot held early afternoon today, Thune prevailed and will lead what is shaping up to be an ambitious Republican agenda heading into 2025. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) will move to minority leader in 2025. The House leadership will also remain intact with current House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and current Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) continuing to lead their parties. There are a handful of races that have yet to be called and so House control remains an open question. <span></span></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">In addition to party leadership changes, important moves on key committees of interest to WIA will also occur. In January, Senator John Boozman (R-AR) will take the helm of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee. As you know, this panel has been working on reauthorizing the Farm Bill and will continue those efforts in the 119<sup>th</sup> Congress as it is unlikely a Farm Bill will be negotiated and passed in the Lame Duck Congressional session occurring in November and December. The current committee chair, Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), is retiring which will allow Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) to move up as the Ranking Member on this committee. Both Boozman and Klobuchar have been strong supporters of our sector. Not only have they been avid proponents of the Wood Innovation and Community Wood Grant programs—two key WIA policy priorities--but also supportive of policies that would deem sawmill residuals (biomass) as “carbon neutral” from an emissions/Clean Air Act perspective.<span>&nbsp; </span><span>&nbsp;</span>Carbon neutrality language is being negotiated as part of the next Farm Bill to complement an existing appropriations policy rider that has been reauthorized every year since 2017. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee will also be under new leadership with Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) moving from Ranking Member to Chairman. Senator Capito has also been an enduring champion of the wood and forest products industry and appreciative of the jobs our sector supports in her home state. The panel she will chair has the lead on EPA-related issues (air, water and waste) as well as transportation and supply chain issues like truck weight reform. The current Chairman—Senator Tom Carper (D-DE)—is retiring and the role of Ranking Member may be filled by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR). </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">On the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, current Ranking Member John Barrasso (R-WY) would ordinarily slide into the Chairman’s role, but he is running unopposed for Senate Republican Whip and will not be serving on this panel in the 119<sup>th</sup> Congress. This committee takes the lead on timber supply and federal forest issues. Likely to take the Chairmanship is Senator Mike Lee (R-UT). Current Chairman Joe Manchin (D-WV) is retiring, and that role may be filled by Senator Martin Heinrich (D-NM). </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Regarding appropriations, industry ally Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) will chair that key panel.<span>&nbsp; </span>Senator Collins has been the lead champion on many wood and forest products industry policy priorities in her time in the Senate. Current Chair Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) is expected to be the Ranking Member. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Finally on the Senate Finance Committee, the existing Chair and Ranking Member will flip with Senator Mike Crapo (R-ID) leading the panel and Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) moving to the Ranking spot. Again, as we have noted, tax policy will be a primary focus of Congress and the Administration next year and Finance holds the pen in the upper chamber on all things tax related.<span>&nbsp; </span></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">In the House, there about 11 races that have yet to be called, but as of this writing Republicans had 216 and Democrats 208 seats in the 435 Member lower chamber. Several of the seats that have not been decided are in California, which is historically slow counting votes. At fundraisers WIA has attended prior to the election, both Republican and Democrat lawmakers opined that the party that wins the White House would also take the House. Currently, most pundits believe the Republicans will prevail and enter 2025 with a very slim majority in the House. However, Democrat leadership in the House we spoke to remain hopeful that the remaining ballots that are being counted will break their way and Democrats will take the lower chamber. Either way, the majority will be a slim one for either party. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Assuming the House does remain in GOP, a few key Members of Congress that are strong champions of our sector will remain in key positions of influence. Primary among them is Rep. Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-Pa), Chairman of the House Agriculture Committee. His panel produced a Farm Bill reauthorization measure that was reported out of committee on a bipartisan basis, but never saw floor action. That bill included language reauthorizing and funding both the Wood Innovation and Community Wood Grant programs as well as beneficial forestry and forest management provisions and biomass carbon neutrality language. Rep. Thompson’s district includes National Forest System lands and is heavily populated with hardwood sawmills. GT is also a strong proponent in the workforce development space and is cochair of the House Career and Technical Education Caucus.<span>&nbsp; </span>He has been a true champion on all of our issues, and we look forward to working with him and his team as they continue their work in these critical roles.<span>&nbsp; </span></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">Likewise, Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR) will continue to chair the House Natural Resources Committee—the panel in the House that leads on federal forest and timber-related policy issues as well as the Endangered Species Act. Mr. Westerman is the only Member of the House with a forestry degree and his district is also home to scores of wood and pulp and paper product manufacturing facilities. He has been the lead for the GOP on climate related matters with his Trillion Trees Act that promotes tree planting and wood markets to help reduce and sequester greenhouse gas emissions. <span>&nbsp;</span>We look forward to our continued work with him and his committee staff. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">The all-important Energy and Commerce Committee will be under new leadership as current Chairman Cathy McMorris-Rodgers is retiring and there is a two-way race to succeed her. Vying for the gavel are Brett Guthrie (R-KY) and Bob Latta (R-OH). The E&amp;C Committee leads on all EPA related matters impacting air, water and waste. WIA has a good relationship with both these lawmakers. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">And finally, the House Ways &amp; Means Committee, which holds the pen on all tax matters including all of the expired and expiring business credits, will be led by Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO). </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">The Lame Duck session of the 118<sup>th</sup> Congress convened on November 12. We expect very little in the way of substantive legislating save for a Continuing Resolution to fund the government into March of 2025. The National Defense Authorization Act will also be passed, but action on a Farm Bill and tax policy will be punted to the 119<sup>th</sup> Congress which convenes January 3. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">As the WIA team looks to next year with a new Congress and a new Administration, we intend to remain laser focused on our key federal public policy priorities. These include:</span></p> <ul style="list-style-type: square;"><li><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">The Farm Bill</span></b><span style="line-height: 115%;">: Enacting a final reauthorization bill that renews and funds grant programs to promote wood product markets, including innovative products like mass timber/CLT. </span></span></li><li><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Tax</span></b><span style="line-height: 115%;">: Restoring key business tax benefits that have been allowed to lapse or begin phasing out, including 100 percent bonus depreciation and the research and development tax credit, as well as extending the 20 percent tax deduction for pass throughs that expires at the end of 2025. </span></span></li><li><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Workforce Development:</span></b><span style="line-height: 115%;"> Passing bipartisan Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act reauthorization legislation that fully funds workforce development and apprenticeship programs. </span></span></li></ul> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">One area of concern with the incoming Administration is its campaign rhetoric around tariffs. While some industry sectors benefited from tariffs during the first Trump Administration, retaliatory tariffs imposed by China on lumber and log exports during the first Trump Administration were devastating for many in the forest product supply chain. Tariffs on inputs to make our machinery is also an area of concern and we will be monitoring developments closely on this front. <span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">As with every election, there will be many new faces in the House and Senate in the 119<sup>th</sup> Congress. The WIA team is preparing materials now that will be useful in our introductory meetings with these officials after they are sworn into office in January.</span> </span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (October 2024)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=684633</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=684633</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Election</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">With Congress in recess and the regulatory agencies relatively quiet for the moment, we thought we would provide a snapshot of how the race stands for control of Congress and the White with less than a month to go before the pivotal November 5 election. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">Starting with the U.S. Senate, Democrats currently control the upper chamber by a single seat—51-49. With Senator Joe Manchin’s (D-WV) retirement announcement late last year, the Senate is effectively tied headed into the election with that open seat certain to flip to Republican. That leaves four races on which to focus—Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin and Montana.</span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">In Michigan, Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) is looking to fill the seat being vacated by Senator Debbie Stabenow, who announced she was retiring after this session of Congress. Slotkin is polling ahead of her Republican opponent former Congressmen Mike Rogers (R-MI), but the race is tight and is in the “toss up” category in the well-respected Cook Political report’s analysis. Likewise in Ohio, incumbent Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) is running ahead of his Republican challenger Bernie Moreno, but the race is within the polling margin of error and Cook has had this race in the toss up category for some time. In Wisconsin, sitting Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) had a 7-point lead based on polls back in August, but that race has tightened considerably and it too is within the margin of error. Her opponent, Eric Hovde, has consolidated the Republican base and many independents in a state that is evenly divided. Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) was reelected to his seat in 2022 by a single point. Lastly, Montana is looking to be the state most likely to determine control of the Senate. Senator Jon Tester (D-MT) is trailing in the polls by about 6-8 points. However, Senator Tester has proven to be resilient over the last few election cycles and the rare Democrat who can win in a red state. Recall Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) pulled out a victory in 2022 after polls showed her trailing by the same margin a month out from election day. But most political analysts are predicting a Republican pick-up and Cook has this race in the “lean Republican” column. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">Other races to watch include the Texas Senate seat held by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX). This race is surprisingly close as Congressman Collin Alred’s (D-TX) campaign has found traction. The Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee—the political campaign funding arm for Senate Democrats--has redirected considerable dollars to support Allred, which suggests that Democrats see a real opportunity in the Lone Star state. Cook has this race as lean Republican. Finally, Senator Deb Fischer (R-NE) is in a surprisingly close race with Independent challenger Dan Osborn. A poll conducted in September actually had Osburn leading Sen. Fischer 45%-44%. Analysts still believe that Senator Fischer will pull this out, but the race is certainly worth watching. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">The bottom line is that, barring any surprises, it is looking likely that the U.S. Senate will switch control to Republican, albeit by the slimmest of margins. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">In the House, Republicans hold a narrow 220-212 majority in the lower chamber. There are 3 vacancies. Twenty-six races are currently in the “toss up “category—12 held by Democrats and 14 held by Republicans—and these races are the ones to watch that will determine control of the House. Election forecast model 538 gives Democrats and Republicans an even chance at controlling the chamber. It is literally a jump ball. At a number of political events that WIA has attended over the last few months, Members of Congress from both parties have said that whoever wins the Presidential contest will likely determine control of the House. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">A few races to watch include Rep. Jared Goden (D-ME), who is in a dead heat with Republican former NASCAR driver Austin Theriault. Golden has been a champion in the House for the forestry and forest products supply chain. He sits on the House Small Business Committee and is a member of the House Working Forests Caucus as well as the House Construction Procurement Caucus. Another close one is Washington’s 3<sup>rd</sup> District, where incumbent Marie Gluesenkamp Perez is facing off with Joe Kent in this swing district. Congresswoman Gluesenkamp Perez-owner of an auto repair and machine shop-- has been a strong champion of workforce development programs that serve small businesses. She is also the author of legislation to accelerate deployment of innovative wood building product (mass timber) manufacturing. She too sits on the House Small Business Committee and House Agriculture Committee. One other to follow closely on election night is Rep. Marc Molinaro’s (R-NY) race with Democrat Josh Riley. This House race is the most expensive in the country and polling shows the two in a dead heat. Rep. Molinaro sits on three key committees of importance for WIA—Small Business, Agriculture and Transportation &amp; Infrastructure. He and his staff have always been very accessible and receptive to our advocacy outreach.</span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">And finally, at the Presidential level, it is looking increasingly like Pennsylvania will determine our next President. Given its 19 Electoral College votes and history showing that Pennsylvania results align closely with Michigan and Wisconsin, analysts are predicting that whichever candidate prevails in the Keystone State will be our next President. Current polling shows the race for the Commonwealth within the margin of error. In fact, that is the case with all 6 of the other swing states—Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia, Nevada and North Carolina. Across the board—Senate, House and Presidential—this election promises to be historically close. And let us not forget that we may yet have an “October Surprise” that may surface in the next few weeks that may weigh on the outcome. In any event, the next month&nbsp; promises to be an incredibly interesting ride. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) </span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">The U.S. forestry and forest products sector received some good news earlier this month when t</span><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">he European Commission announced a 12-month delay in implementation of EUDR, pushing the effective date for large companies to December 30, 2025. The proposal must first be adopted by both the EU Parliament and the EU Council, though most acts are adopted during the first reading.</span></p> <p><span style="background: white; line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">The additional time is meant to provide impacted companies adequate time to phase in their solutions, ensuring smooth implementation from the start. The Commission noted that constant concerns expressed by global partners—including the U.S. government-- regarding their ability to comply with EUDR’s requirements played a role in the delay. The EU Commission made clear that this extension in no way puts into question the objectives or the substance of the law.</span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">The one-year delay—assuming it is enacted—is helpful, but the fact remains that tracing trees used to make wood products back to the exact parcel where they were harvested is problematic and this requirement is a linchpin of the EU law. We will keep you apprised of developments. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">The upcoming Lame Duck session of Congress following the election—the last gasp of the 118<sup>th</sup> Congress—may include action on delaying implementation of the Corporate Transparency Act. As we have written about, this little-known law that took effect this year imposes burdensome filing and recordkeeping requirements on small to medium-sized businesses. FinCen—the arm of the U.S. Department of Treasury in charge of implementing the CTA—came out earlier in October with data showing the vast majority of businesses required to file under the CTA have not done so – despite just three months left before the year-end filing deadline. The fact of the matter is that compliance obligations have not been well communicated by FinCen and the chorus of policymakers calling for a one-year delay is growing. Penalties for non-compliance can be up to $590 per day and up to 2 years in jail. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">The CTA is unique in that it explicitly targets the very companies least equipped to shoulder its regulatory burdens. Among its various exemptions, the statute includes a carve out for entities whose revenue exceeds $5 million and which employ more than 20 full-time employees. Companies not meeting those thresholds – essentially every small business currently operating in America today – must comply. FinCEN estimates that more than 32 million such entities will be affected by the new law just this year, with an additional 6 million each subsequent year as new businesses are formed.</span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;"></span><br /></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">In September, Rep. Zach Nunn (R-GA) introduced H.R. 9278 which would postpone the CTA reporting requirement for one year. The bill—the Protect Small Businesses from Excessive Paperwork Act—is pending in the House Financial Services Committee.</span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;"></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Tax</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee-the tax writing panel in the upper chamber, said earlier this month that revising and updating tax law governing pass through entities like S-Corporations and partnerships should be a priority next year when Congress debates business tax benefit extension. Chairman Wyden has long been vocal in his suspicion of pass throughs and partnerships as a tax avoidance channel for upper income taxpayers. In 2021, he unveiled a legislative proposal to close what he and his team on the committee deemed “loopholes” in pass through tax law that should be closed. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">Currently, pass through business structures comprise 95 percent of all U.S. businesses and 62 percent of private sector workers. The House Ways &amp; Means Committee has established a number of tax “teams” to identify policy solutions to the upcoming 2025 tax cliff when most of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) tax benefits expire.&nbsp; One of these is the Main Street Tax Team led by Rep. Lloyed Smucker (R-PA) which is tasked with formulating plans for a number of expiring tax benefits including the Sec. 199A 20 percent deduction for S-Corporations and other pass-through business structures. Without Congressional action, that deduction will lapse at the end of next year. Rep. Smucker is also the sponsor of House legislation (H.R. 4721) to make the Sec. 199A deduction permanent, which makes him a great fit for this effort. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">In another tax development, Senate Democrat staff familiar with Senator Wyden’s plans indicated that Senate Democrats intend to have a tax package reflecting Kamala Harris’s priorities ready on “day one” of a Harris Presidency. The goal is to have a jump start on negotiations over tax policy in the new Congress with a new President. Specifics are sparse at this point, but WIA will be meeting with key staff in the coming weeks to ascertain specific areas of tax policy that will be prioritized in the package.&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (September 2024)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=682348</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=682348</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Congress</strong><br />Members of Congress returned to Washinton earlier this month after a lengthy August recess. Their priority deliverable will be forging agreement on a measure to fund the federal government past September 30 when current funding authorities expire. The House has passed most of its 12 appropriations bills, but nearly all of the Senate bills have not even received Committee consideration. This means that a Continuing Resolution or CR will be necessary and as usual, there is looming drama around what policy rider(s) may be attached to that vehicle. The CR that House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) unveiled last week and ultimately withdrew would fund the government through March 28 and included the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require individuals to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship in order to register to vote in federal elections. Opponents of the bill assert that the measure is unnecessary as proof or verification of citizenship is already a requirement during voter registration. Speaker Johnson had to pull the measure due to Democrat opposition and defections within his own party. Any CR that includes the SAVE Act is dead on arrival in the Democrat-controlled Senate. Also, Senate Democrats oppose a funding measure that extends into next year. We believe that in the end, a short-term clean CR—meaning no policy riders—will be sent to the President on or before September 30 that funds government operations into early to mid-December and that the odds of a federal government shut down are remote this close to the election.</p><p><strong>OSHA’s Heat Standard</strong><br />Late last month, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) published its long-awaited workplace heat standard. The notice may be found <a href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-08-30/pdf/2024-14824.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p><p>In its narrative supporting the proposal, OSHA cites a Bureau of Labor Statistics study which found that 1,042 U.S. workers died due to occupational exposure to environmental heat between 1992 and 2022, averaging 34 deaths per year. Most of the reported fatalities involved workers in the manufacturing, agriculture, landscaping, construction, postal and delivery service sectors.&nbsp;</p><p>Overall, the proposed standard would require employers to create a plan known as a HIIPP (Heat Injury and Illness Prevention Plan) to evaluate and control heat hazards in their workplace. Specifically, the proposed standard would apply to all employers and would apply when employees are exposed to heat indexes of 80 degrees—defined as the “initial heat trigger”—for more than fifteen minutes in any sixty-minute period. Employers with outdoor work sites would be required to monitor the temperature continuously to evaluate employee exposure to heat. For indoor work sites, employers would be required to identify areas where the heat index could be 80 degrees or more and include a temperature monitoring plan in their written HIIPP. The proposal imposes additional obligations on employers when the high heat trigger-90 degrees-is reached.&nbsp;</p><p>Publication in the Federal Register kicks off a 120-day public comment period which ends on December 30.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Workforce Development</strong><br />Last Wednesday, the House Ways &amp; Means Committee marked up and passed a package of bills including one measure that seeks to promote workforce development. The legislation, H.R. 9461 sponsored by Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-PA), authorizes an income tax credit for individuals that contribute to workforce development and apprenticeship training programs. Eligible organizations receiving contributions must provide services defined in the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act – including occupational skills training, on-the-job training, skills upgrading and retraining, entrepreneurial training, and adult education and literacy activities. The credit would max out at the lesser of either $150,000 or 25 percent of a taxpayer’s liability. The bill was reported from committee on a 22-15 vote.</p><p>This legislation builds on action taken by the committee in July, when the Ways and Means Committee marked up legislation that expanded 529 accounts to help parents save for their child’s education and strengthen workforce opportunities for students wishing to learn a skill or trade.</p><p><strong>Port Strike</strong><br />Businesses up and down the supply chain are following developments closely on the looming strike by workers at all maritime container ports along the East and Gulf Coasts. A letter is circulating for association signatures that is expected to be sent to President Biden next week asking for the Administration to engage with the parties to negotiate a new labor agreement so that port closures are avoided. In addition to the business community letter, House Republicans led by House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee’s Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Subcommittee Chairman Daniel Webster (R-FL) are circulating <a href="https://woodindustry.org/resource/resmgr/washington_report/issues/2024/House_Republican_Port_Strike.pdf" target="_blank">this letter to the President</a> urging the Administration to intervene in the negotiations.&nbsp;</p><p>By way of background, the current Master Contract between the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) and the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) is set to expire September 30. Unfortunately, negotiations on a new contract are at a stalemate due to proposed wage increases for union employees and the adoption of automated technologies at ports. The parties are talking, but little progress on a final deal has been made.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Farm Bill<br /></strong>WIA met with committee staff on the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee earlier this month to discuss provisions of interest to our sector in the Farm Bill and prospects for a reauthorization bill passing later this year. Ranking Member Boozman (R-AR) continues to tell groups that a Farm Bill rewrite is possible in the Lame Duck session of Congress following the election. However, actual legislative text has not been shared between Democrats and Republicans on committee and it appears that marking up and passing a bill in a short Lame Duck session would be a stretch. The good news is that the summaries that have been provided describing Democrat and Republican proposals that would be included in the next Farm Bill are all positive for the wood products sector. The proposals notably feature robust funding for both the Wood Innovation Grant and Community Wood Grant programs. The House Agriculture Committee-passed bill treats these programs similarly and is supported by the wood products sector. WIA will keep you apprised of developments and the progress of our advocacy in this space for the remainder of 2024 and into 2025 if necessary.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>European Union Deforestation Regulation – More Countries Request Delay of Implementation<br /></strong>Germany and Brazil joined a growing chorus of countries in requesting that the European Union delay&nbsp; implementation of its highly controversial EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) set to take effect at the end of this year. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz requested the EU delay implementing the new regulation, asserting that it could create serious trade disruptions and create hardships for many sectors, including the forest products industry. Recall that this regulation, which is slated to take effect December 30, 2024, requires commodities (including wood) to show that they are “deforestation free” in order to enter the EU stream of commerce.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>Mauro Vieira, Brazil Miniter of Foreign Affairs in a letter that was sent to the European Commission leadership stated that “The implementation of the European Union's anti-deforestation regulation (EUDR), scheduled to begin at the end of 2024, is a matter of serious concern for various Brazilian export sectors and for the Brazilian government. Brazil is one of the EU’s main suppliers of most of the products targeted by the legislation, which account for over 30% of our exports to the Union. To avoid any negative impact on our trade relations, we request that the EU refrain.”&nbsp;</p><p>The U.S. Department of Agriculture will be sending a delegation later this month to visit European Union countries and EU officials to discuss this issue and the challenges it will present to U.S. exporters.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (August 2024)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=680216</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=680216</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<strong>Congress</strong><br />Members of the House of Representatives left town a week early this year, opting to begin their August recess in July. The Senate followed suit the following week after the vote on the tax bill’s procedural motion discussed below. Congress will be in recess all of August and will return September 9 for what is expected to be a shortened work period in DC before they go back to the campaign trail through the election in November.<br />&nbsp;<br /><strong>Tax</strong><br />Just before the Senate left town, a procedural motion was brought to the Senate floor and voted down by a vote of 48-44.&nbsp; The underlying bill attached to the Motion to Consider as it is known was H.R. 7024—the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act. Recall, this legislation passed the House January 31 on an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 357-70. The legislation restores retroactively the 100 percent bonus depreciation tax credit, which took a 20 percent haircut in 2023 and another 20 percent reduction in 2024. The bill would restore the write off to 100 percent in 2023 and extend that benefit through 2025. The legislation also retroactively extends through 2025 the research and development tax credit which expired in 2022 and includes more favorable interest deductibility provisions. Finally, it bumps up the deduction limits under Sec. 179, which allows businesses to write off business expenses for depreciable assets like equipment, vehicles and software. These business tax credits are paired with a more robust Child Tax Credit, which was successful in attracting support from Democrats and a number of Republicans who are working on rebranding the Republican party to one focused less on corporate America and more on working families.&nbsp;<br /><br />While we were encouraged by the bipartisan vote in the House and optimistic for speedy consideration in the upper chamber, that outcome did not materialize. Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Mike Crapo (R-ID) pushed for the bill to go through regular order in the Senate with a committee markup and consideration of amendments. The majority’s concern with that approach is that the House-passed bill represented a delicate balance of competing interests and any changes to the legislation were seen as potentially upsetting that balance and killing the effort.<br />&nbsp;<br />The procedural motion’s failure was unfortunate but not unexpected as Senate Republicans remain opposed to the legislation. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) put the procedural motion up for a vote to get lawmakers’ position on record in advance of the upcoming election in November. Schumer did switch his vote from “yea” to “nay” at the last minute as a parliamentary move to enable the legislation to be brought up at a later date.&nbsp;<br /><br />Next year is a consequential one in the tax space. In addition to all of the benefits in H.R. 7024 that need to be acted upon, the Sec. 199A deduction (discussed below) expires at the end of 2025. WIA attended a breakfast fundraising event in late July for House Ways &amp; Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO). During the discussion, Chairman Smith noted that $4.6 trillion (with a T) in tax benefits expire at the end of next year. Along with our workforce, transportation/supply chain priorities and other policy priorities, WIA will be busy working to restore and preserve these important tax benefits that are critical to the competitiveness of Main Street businesses prevalent in our sector.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<br /><br />In other news in the tax space, Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-PA)—leader of the newly formed House Ways &amp; Means Committee’s Main Street Tax Team—hosted a forum in early August in southern York County, PA to discuss the importance of extending Sec. 199A of the Internal Revenue Code. Recall, this is the provision in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 that attempts to level the playing field in the tax code between larger corporations organized as C corporations and many small and medium sized businesses in our sector organized as pass throughs. The tax rate for C corporations in the TCJA was lowered to 21 percent and Sec. 199A is a 20 percent tax deduction for S-Corporations and other pass-through entities.&nbsp;<br /><br />Eight individuals ranging from financial advisors to manufacturers to a dairy farm owner testified at the roundtable in support of extending 199A and the negative effects if Congress fails to act next year. The provision, like many other pieces of the TCJA, expires at the end of 2025. Rep. Smucker is the lead sponsor in the House of the Main Street Tax Credit Act (H.R. 4721) which would extend this 20 percent deduction permanently. The legislation currently has 185 cosponsors, but unfortunately only 2 Democrats are on board.&nbsp;<br /><br />Looking forward, action on this bill is highly unlikely this year, but this issue will be a focal point in 2025. Next year will also be a new Congress—the 119th Congress—and all current pending legislation dies when the 118th is gaveled out sometime in late November or December, depending on the length of the Lame Duck session following the election. The bottom line is that this bill will have to be reintroduced next year and WIA will be working hard with our champions on and off the Hill to recruit bipartisan support for the new bill.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /><strong><br />Truck Weight/Supply Chain</strong><br />Last week, a coalition comprised of associations representing both Class 1 railroad companies and&nbsp; smaller short line rail operations, as well as unions and other groups sent a letter to House leadership expressing opposition to H.R. 3372—an WIA-supported bill that authorizes a pilot program for heavier 91,000-pound rigs equipped with a sixth axle to travel on our nation’s interstate highway system. The current gross vehicle truck weight limit on federal highways is 81,000 pounds on 5 axles.&nbsp;<br /><br />The letter was prompted by a sign-on letter request from Members of Congress supporting H.R. 3372 urging House leadership to vote on the measure when Congress returns in September. One of the supporting talking points for H.R. 3372 is that it would reduce truck traffic on local roads that frequently run through small towns and intersect cross walks by encouraging shippers to move freight more efficiently on the federal interstate system. The opposition letter turns that argument on its head by asserting the following:<br /><br /><em>Increases in truck size and weight would have especially severe consequences for local roads and bridges because bigger trucks are not limited to the interstates. These heavier and longer trucks need to run on state and local roads to pick up and drop off freight, as well as for “reasonable access” for fuel, food and other necessities. Local roads and bridges face significantly more damage than interstates because they may be older, built to lower standards, or are already in poor condition.<br /></em><br />The letter was written by the Coalition Against Bigger Trucks—a Class 1 railroad-funded organization that has lobbied against any reform of federal truck weight policy for over a decade. The rails view any increase in allowable truck weight limits as a competitive threat, despite the fact that rail cannot possibly serve all shippers’ needs and that the Class 1s would actually increase profits as a 91,000-pound limit would escalate truck traffic to rail intermodal facilities. The letter is purposefully misleading too as it references “longer” trucks. The rigs that would be authorized by the pilot in H.R. 3372 to travel on the federal interstate would have the exact same configuration as trucks currently operating on our roads today. The only difference is the addition of the sixth axle that improves weight dispersion across all the tires, thereby reducing pavement consumption, and also improving braking.&nbsp;<br /><br />Despite opposition from the railroads, WIA will continue to advocate for House-passage of this common-sense measure to increase truck shipping efficiency.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /><br /><strong>Workforce</strong><br />Before leaving for the August recess, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved its Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Labor-Health and Human Services-Education appropriations bill on a bipartisan basis, which contains a $35 million plus up over FY 2024 for the Perkins Basic State Grant program. Overall, the measure would increase education programs by about $1 billion. The Senate legislation funnels considerably more resources for education and workforce development programs than the House version of the bill released earlier this summer.<br /><br />The appropriations process will resume in September when both chambers return from the August recess. ACTE and other workforce focused advocacy groups are waging a grass roots efforts to persuade Congress to approve the Senate’s version when a final FY 2025 budget deal is finalized. We will keep you apprised of developments.&nbsp;<br /><br /><strong>Low Interest Business Loan Program<br /></strong>On August 8, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced that it will receive applications from local lenders for funding to help create jobs in rural areas through the agency’s Intermediary Relending Program. The program provides low-interest loans to local lenders who then relend the funds to local businesses to grow economies in rural communities. These loans can be used by businesses to buy equipment and machinery and “acquire, build, convert, expand or repair a business,” among other things. The announcement with more information may be found <a href="https://www.rd.usda.gov/media/file/download/usda-rd-sa-irp-nosa-08082024.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 16:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (July 2024)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=678075</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=678075</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Congress</strong><br />Both Houses of Congress were in recess last week due to the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee. They return July 22 and face a two-week sprint before they recess again for the month of August. The focus will be on Fiscal Year 2025 appropriations bills. All of the 12 House appropriations bills have been reported from the House Appropriations Committee and 4 of these have passed the lower chamber. The Senate lags behind considerably with only 3 of the 12 bills having received committee consideration and none of the 3 has been considered by the full Senate. The fiscal year ends September 30 and a Continuing Resolution to keep the government funded past that date is almost a certainty.&nbsp;</p><p>The 2024 Presidential election took an interesting, but not unexpected, turn over the weekend with President Biden ending his bid for reelection. This development was looking inevitable heading into the weekend with an increasing number of Democrat Senators and House members publicly calling for him to step aside. Gaming this potential scenario out last week, it was anticipated that Biden’s replacement would be decided by delegates at an open convention in August. But late Sunday and into Monday, most if not all of the would-be contenders fell in line with endorsements of Vice President Harris. This has been and will be a truly extraordinary election cycle and, for those interested in politics and the political process, it does not get more fascinating than this. All eyes now are on her pick of a running mate in the coming days. Mostly governors and former governors from swing states have surfaced as potential picks. Vice President Harris was polling slightly better that President Biden in a match-up with former President Trump before this weekend’s development. But now that this looks like an actual versus theoretical contest, pollsters are feverishly putting out surveys in the field to gauge the state of play.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Port Strike</strong><br />WIA continues to monitor developments on labor contract negotiations that impact ports along the East and Gulf Coasts. A statement released earlier this month by the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) indicated that the threat of a strike after the current Sept. 30 contract expiration deadline is "growing more likely" as the negotiations remain at an impasse. ILA’s chief negotiator said that the maritime employers represented by United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) "are running out of time" to negotiate a new master contract agreement and avoid a coastwide work stoppage across 36 ports from Maine to Texas.</p><p>Contract talks broke down after ILA learned that Maersk-owned APM Terminals and Maersk Line were using an "auto gate" system at Alabama's Port of Mobile, which powers the gate that enables trucks to enter and exit a terminal and be autonomously processed without union labor. Upon this discovery, the ILA said in June that it would not meet with USMX until the auto gate issue is resolved. Talks have not resumed in the weeks since, however USMX was out with a press release last week assuring customers that it intends to return to the negotiating table “to avoid any further disruption to the cargo flow and/or damage to our nation’s economy.”</p><p>WIA joined 158 other trade associations in signing a letter to President Biden urging his Administration to provide all the support necessary to bring the parties together so that a new master contract may be forged. That letter may be found <strong><a href="https://woodindustry.org/resource/resmgr/washington_report/issues/2024/East_Coast-Gulf_Coast_Port_L.pdf" target="_blank">here</a></strong>.&nbsp;</p><p>Obviously, a port strike would have enormous ramifications up and down the supply chain. We will keep you apprised of progress of contract talks.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Chevron Deference</strong><br />Earlier in July, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on a case with far-reaching consequences for federal agencies and the regulated community. In <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo</em></span></strong>, the Court effectively repealed the 40 year old Chevron Deference which gave federal regulatory agencies and departments wide latitude in interpreting federal statutes. The ruling is seen as a considerable victory for the regulated community. A group that provided an analysis shortly after the ruling was issued had this to say—</p><p style="margin-left: 40px;"><em>“As a general matter, the Loper decision is likely to cause federal agencies to exercise greater restraint when interpreting statutes. During the past several Administrations, federal agencies (of both political parties) appeared to become more aggressive in adopting strained interpretations of statutes in order to accomplish political objectives. This practice is likely to end. Under Loper, companies can likely expect more predictability and stability in the interpretations given the federal statutes governing their operations.“</em></p><p>A number of associations were circulating a letter to President Biden urging him to pause all rulemakings until a thorough review of these proposals—both under development and those recently finalized—is conducted to ensure that they comply with the letter and spirit of the Loper decision.</p><p><strong>OSHA Employer Heat Standard Proposed Rule&nbsp;<br /></strong>This month, the Biden administration announced it would publish a proposed rule to protect workers from extreme heat. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) submitted the rule to be published in the Federal Register, which will likely occur in the coming days. </p><p>The measure proposes two thresholds for worker protection. At 80 degrees, employers would have to provide employees with drinking water and shaded or cooled break areas. If the heat index reaches 90 degrees or above, workers would have mandatory 15-minute breaks every two hours, and supervisors would need to monitor workers for signs of heat illness and remind workers to drink water. In situations where employees are working alone, supervisors would be required to contact them every 2 hours. Employers would be required to identify heat hazards, develop emergency response plans related to heat illness, and train employees and supervisors on the signs and symptoms of such illnesses.</p><p>Worker protections in the proposal would apply for both indoor and outdoor employees and would cover a wide array of workplaces, including wood machinery manufacturers. The National Association of Manufacturers posted on social media that the proposal "adds to the regulatory onslaught facing manufacturers in America.<em>" The group called for "a heat standard that provides greater flexibility."</em></p><p>WIA will either be submitting formal comments on this proposal or joining comments prepared by some of the larger trades impacted by this action.</p><p><strong>Endangered Species Act<br /></strong>House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Bruce Westerman (R-AR) intends to introduce legislation this week that would comprehensively reform the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This statute has long been used by environmental groups as a tool to curtail forest management on public and private lands. Chairman Westerman’s legislation seeks to soften the impact of ESA listing decisions on landowners by, among other things, requiring USFWS to establish objective, incremental recovery goals for listed species. </p><p>The 38-page discussion draft of the ESA Amendments Act of 2024 was rolled out at a hearing last week. A section-by-section summary of the bill suggests that it seeks to restore a number of definitions that were put in place through regulations adopted during the Trump Administration. One of these definitions is “critical habitat” which is a key piece in determining the impact of a listing decision. A recent example is the Northern Longeared Bat (NLEB). A few years ago, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had proposed listing the NLEB as “endangered” and the definition of critical habitat was so broad that it would have precluded any timber harvesting or landscape disturbance in the bat’s 40 state range during roosting months. Advocacy efforts prevailed in rolling that action back, but it pointed out the need for ESA reform. </p><p>In addition to codifying important definitions, the bill will establish an environmental baseline to measure successful outcomes and incentivize the recovery of listed species. According to the sponsor, the bill will also promote species conservation on private and public lands and create greater transparency and accountability in the ESA regulatory process. This issue is more of an upstream one for WIA, but we are monitoring developments in this space.</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington Report (June 2024)</title>
<link>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=675645</link>
<guid>https://woodindustry.org/news/news.asp?id=675645</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial;">WIOA Reauthorization Hearing</span></b></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">On June 12, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee held a hearing to receive input on the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), our nation’s bedrock statute that authorizes and funds workforce development and apprenticeship programs around the country. Recall that the House earlier this spring passed WIOA reauthorization legislation (A Stronger Workforce for America Act-H.R. 6655) by an overwhelming margin with broad bipartisan support. While a comprehensive Senate WIOA reauthorization bill has not been unveiled, several “marker” bills have been introduced and we have been told that Senate HELP Committee staff have been in active discussions with their counterparts in the House. While not always the case, holding a hearing typically means that introduction of a comprehensive bill is imminent. We are close to the process and will update you on this effort as soon as we know more. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">During the hearing, it was evident that Senators are eager to move on a reauthorization bill that makes needed changes to WIOA. The statute has not been renewed since 2014 and both witnesses and Senators noted that the economy and status of the workforce has changed considerably over the last decade. Another common theme from witnesses is that WIOA needs more funding. When factoring inflation, Congress has steadily cut investments in workforce programs, career and technical Education, and adult education programs over the past twenty years and the U.S. is ranked near the bottom of all OECD countries in spending on workforce development. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">One witness noted that only 175,831 individuals received training services under WIOA in program year 2022—a relatively small group for what is supposed to be the federal government’s premier training program. As a point of contrast, six million Pell grants were provided to students under the Higher Education Act for the 2022-2023 academic year. It was pointed out that Pell grants have led to far more training opportunities for qualified individuals, are far easier to access and provide much more significant support. It was also noted that the appropriations for WIOA formula programs should be increased, but a much greater share of those funds should be used for training services in conjunction with the critical wraparound support that make it possible for potential employees to utilize these training services. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">The importance of industry and sector partnerships was also a point of emphasis among the witnesses. A common theme was that Congress should support industry or sector partnerships that help businesses engage in the public workforce system. Each local community has a local economy and employers in those communities are best able to identify what skills and training are needed and what trends are emerging in a given industry. A witness from the Chicago Jobs Council had this to say—"We never want to train people for jobs that no longer exist or have declined while we’re working on developing training programs. It’s critical to involve employers on the front end to ensure that does not happen. Industry or sector partnerships bring together local businesses, unions and worker organizations, community colleges, training providers, and community organizations to develop industry-specific workforce strategies and provide training that supports local and regional demand.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Farm Bill</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">Last week, Ranking Member of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee John Boozman (R-AR) introduced a summary of the Republican version of Farm Bill reauthorization legislation. What was unveiled appears to be similar to the House Farm Bill reauthorization legislation that passed out of committee earlier this spring. Notably for WIA, the bill would bolster both the Community Wood and Wood Innovation Programs that strive to accelerate deployment of building projects utilizing mass timber and other innovative wood products.&nbsp; </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">Senator Boozman’s release of this summary is seen as an attempt to jump start negotiations with Committee Chairman Debbie Stabenow (D-MI). Democrats and Republicans have been far apart on negotiations, particularly around spending on supplemental nutrition assistance programs and reprogramming Inflation Reduction Act funding into the bill’s conservation programs. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">The Farm Bill extension that was enacted last year expires September 30. It is difficult to envision a scenario where a comprehensive Farm Bill is forged in the coming weeks to meet that deadline. We expect another extension and action on this front possibly after the election or more likely in 2025. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR)</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">A relatively little known, but draconian mandate was enacted in the EU that threatens to preclude any wood product made in the U.S. from being sold into the EU market beginning January 1, 2025. Known as the EUDR, the law requires wood products manufacturers (and manufacturers of other commodities like pulp and paper) to provide exact geolocation data indicating the precise area in which trees were harvested to produce the product. No U.S. producer can meet this level of tracing granularity and trade groups have been sounding the alarm. In recent months there have been numerous calls to delay implementation of the EUDR, with perhaps the loudest calls for delay coming from within the EU itself. Some government officials and many industry groups have become alarmed that implementation challenges will undermine the competitiveness of European industry and contribute to inflationary pressures in the food sector. EUDR also applies to soy, palm oil, cattle, cocoa, coffee and rubber. &nbsp;</span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">The first signs of internal dissent came in March in a letter sent to the European Commission signed by six European wood industry organizations calling for EUDR implementation delay. Signatories to this letter were the European Confederation of Woodworking Industries (CEI-Bois), the European Furniture Industries Confederation (EFIC), the European Organization of the Sawmill Industry (EOS), the European Panel Federation (EPF), the European Timber Trade Federation (ETTF), and the European Federation of the Parquet industry (FEP). This was followed by a similar letter signed by 19 wood trade organizations in France sent to the French Environment Minister. </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">Numerous Congressional letters have been sent to U.S. Trade Representative Tai urging her and her team to work with her EU counterparts to head off any trade disruptions that the EUDR would certainly cause if allowed to take effect next year. WIA is monitoring the issue and will keep you apprised of developments. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Congressional Outreach</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">Presidential election years typically result in a shortened Congressional calendar to allow Members of Congress ample time to campaign and 2024 is proving to be no exception to this rule. Last week, the House was in recess. The Senate was in session for a couple of days but then left town in advance of the Juneteenth federal holiday and will not be returning to Washington until July 8. The Republican National Convention is in mid-July and both Houses are out that week as well. Moving into August, Members of Congress will be taking their annual month-long August recess where they will be back in their states and districts. They return to Washington after Labor Day and are here through September but then leave again for the entire month of October through the November election. The bottom line is there are just not a lot of days left in the 118<sup>th</sup> Session of Congress for lawmakers to legislate. To borrow a line from the infamous Yogi Berra, “It’s gettin late early.” </span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">What this means is we are likely looking at a scenario yet again where meaningful action on our policy priorities is punted to the Lame Duck session of Congress following the election or into 2025. Our federal advocacy efforts will proceed unabated, however, and we continue to meet with key staff in the House and Senate to discuss pathways for enactment of our policy deliverables. One benefit of Members of Congress being back in their states and districts for prolonged periods of time is that it affords ample opportunities for facility tours. For the next few months, federal lawmakers up for reelection in November will be seeking out photo opportunities with local job creators and their employees. Now is the time to make your voices heard by inviting your Representative or Senator to tour your operation and having a conversation about what Congress can do—or not do—to help your business. If you are interested in setting up a tour at your manufacturing site with a Member of Congress, WIA staff stands ready to assist you in this effort.&nbsp; </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">Tax</span></b></span></p> <p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;">Earlier in June, Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) introduced the S-Corporation Modernization Act of 2024 (H.R. 8614). The legislation, which has been introduced in previous Congresses, seeks to make improvements to the S-Corporation tax model which over 5 million small businesses across the country currently utilize. In short, the bill authorizes reforms to help S corporations operate more easily, which would improve their ability to raise capital.&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="background: white;"><span style="padding: 0in; border: 1pt none windowtext; font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: black;">One of its key provisions modifies the passive income rules.<b> </b></span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: black;">The tax code currently imposes an additional tax on S corporations that previously converted from being a C corporation (typically utilized by larger companies) if more than 25 percent of the S corporation’s income is passive in nature (such as rents, royalties, dividends, interest and annuities).&nbsp;This provision would implement a 2001 recommendation by the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) that this threshold be increased to 60 percent and that the rules be changed so that an S corporation paying this tax does not lose its S corporation status.&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="background: white;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;"><span style="padding: 0in; border: 1pt none windowtext; font-family: Arial; color: black;">Another provision addresses S corporation individual retirement account (IRA) shareholders. Specifically, language in the bill would </span><span style="font-family: Arial; color: black;">permit individuals to own shares in an S corporation through an IRA. Current law allows for IRA ownership of S corporation stock, but only if the S corporation is a bank and the stock was held by the IRA as of October 22, 2004.&nbsp;As under current law, the IRA would be required to pay Unrelated Business Income Tax on its share of the S corporation’s income.&nbsp;A significant percentage of banks are currently organized as S corporations.&nbsp;</span><br /></span></p> <p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: black;">There are a number of other provisions in the legislation, text for which is not yet available as it was just introduced. Rep. Wenstrup sits on the House Ways &amp; Means Committee, which is the panel with sole jurisdiction over tax policy in the lower chamber. We expect this bill to be in the mix next year when tax policy deliberations intensify in advance of the tax policy “cliff” that looms at the end of 2025.</span><br /></span></p> <p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;"><b><span style="color: black;">Federal Forest Management</span></b><br /></span></p> <p style="background: white; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: black;">A few weeks ago, </span><span style="font-family: Arial; color: black;">Senators Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), John Barrasso (R-WY), John Thune (R-SD) and Mike Rounds (R-SD) sent a letter to U.S. Forest Service Chief Randy Moore criticizing the Service for reductions in the federal timber sale program. That letter may be <a href="https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/5.23.24-Black-Hill-Forest-Letter1.pdf" target="_blank">found here</a>.<br /><br /></span></span><span style="color: black; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;">The Senators point out that, without a dependable supply of logs, sawmills in proximity to national forests are closing across the country. The letter correctly notes that there is more standing timber on the Black Hills National Forest than there was in the 1970s and 80s and that reduction in forest management only results in wildfire outbreaks and disease and insect infestation in overstocked stands. The letter closes with the following questions to Chief Moore with a June 28 deadline for the Service to respond--</span></p> <ul style="list-style-type: square;"><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: black;">What is the Forest Service doing to increase timber harvest levels on the Black Hills National Forest?</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: black;">What are the main drivers of the timber target shortfalls since 2018? </span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: black;">What resources does the agency need to increase timber harvest levels on the Black Hills National Forest? If the agency needs additional funding, please provide a specific amount and breakdown of how it will be used to increase timber harvest levels above 63,000 CCF. </span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: black;">How many years will it take for the agency to ramp up to harvest levels to meet the collaboratively identified 120,000 CCF target?</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: black;">Will the agency commit to preventing further economic harm to the forest products industry by providing a consistent supply of timber?</span></li></ul>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
